Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335518›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2023

Machine learning to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest from patients presenting to the emergency department.

Tsung-Chien Lu, Chih-Hung Wang, Fan-Ya Chou, Jen-Tang Sun, Eric H Chou, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chu-Lin Tsai, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Cheng-Chung Fang, Chien-Hua Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tsung-Chien LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Chih-Hung WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Fan-Ya ChouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Jen-Tang SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Eric H ChouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baylor Scott and White All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Edward Pei-Chuan HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Chu-Lin TsaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan. chulintsai@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-1513
Matthew Huei-Ming MaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chung FangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
Chien-Hua HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 111-2634-F-002 -015National Taiwan University Hospital 105-N3102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the emergency department (ED) is not uncommon but often fatal. Using the machine learning (ML) approach, we sought to predict ED-based IHCA (EDCA) in patients presenting to the ED based on triage data. We retrieved 733,398 ED records from a tertiary teaching hospital over a 7 year period (Jan. 1, 2009-Dec. 31, 2015). We included only adult patients (≥ 18 y) and excluded cases presenting as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Primary outcome (EDCA) was identified via a resuscitation code. Patient demographics, triage data, and structured chief complaints (CCs), were extracted. Stratified split was used to divide the dataset into the training and testing cohort at a 3-to-1 ratio. Three supervised ML models were trained and performances were evaluated and compared to the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and logistic regression (LR) model by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We included 316,465 adult ED records for analysis. Of them, 636 (0.2%) developed EDCA. Of the constructed ML models, Random Forest outperformed the others with the best AUC result (0.931, 95% CI 0.911-0.949), followed by Gradient Boosting (0.930, 95% CI 0.909-0.948) and Extra Trees classifier (0.915, 95% CI 0.892-0.936). Although the differences between each of ML models and LR (AUC: 0.905, 95% CI 0.882-0.926) were not significant, all constructed ML models performed significantly better than using the NEWS2 scoring system (AUC 0.678, 95% CI 0.635-0.722). Our ML models showed excellent discriminatory performance to identify EDCA based only on the triage information. This ML approach has the potential to reduce unexpected resuscitation events if successfully implemented in the ED information system.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAdultHospitalsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningTriageCardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency departmentIn-hospital cardiac arrestMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.