Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335496›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Read-Based Phasing and Analysis of Phased Variants with WhatsHap.

Marcel Martin, Peter Ebert, Tobias Marschall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurology. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-read sequencing reveals SVA insertion in AP3B1 causing Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome 2.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcel MartinDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Solna, Sweden. marcel.martin@scilifelab.se.
Peter EbertInstitute for Medical Biometry and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. peter.ebert@iscb.org.
Tobias MarschallInstitute for Medical Biometry and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. tobias.marschall@hhu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WhatsHap is a command-line tool for phasing and phasing-related tasks. It allows to infer haplotypes in diploid and polyploid samples based on (preferably long) reads covering at least two heterozygous variants. It offers additional tools for working with phased variant calls such as computing statistics, comparing different phasings and assigning reads in alignment files to their haplotype.

Indexed as

DiploidyPolyploidyAlgorithmsHaplotypesHeterozygoteHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAHaplotype assemblyLong readsPedigree phasingPolyploid phasingRead-based phasing

Identifiers

PMID36335496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.