Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335401›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms.

Ren-Hao Hu, Hai-Bin Zhang, Biao Yuan, Ke-Hui Zhang, Jia-Yi Xu, Xi-Mao Cui, Tao Du, Chun Song, Shun Zhang, Xiao-Hua Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Health information-seeking experience in people with head and neck neoplasms undergoing treatment: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ren-Hao Hu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Bin Zhang *Center of Digestive Endoscopy, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Biao YuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ke-Hui ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Yi XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xi-Mao CuiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tao DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Chun SongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shun ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. v2zs@hotmail.com.
Xiao-Hua JiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. jiangxiaohuash@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer is a major public health problem worldwide. Social media has affected public's daily lives in ways no one ever thought possible. Both TikoTok and its Chinese version Douyin are the most popular short video posting platform. This study aimed to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and completeness of videos for gastric cancer on TikTok and Douyin.

methodsThe terms "gastric cancer" was searched on TikTok in both English and Japanese, and on Douyin in Chinese. The first 100 videos in three languages (website's default setting) were checked. QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and DISCERN as the instrument for assessing the quality of the information in each video. Content was analysed under six categories (aetiology, anatomy, symptoms, preventions, treatments, and prognosis). The educational value and completeness were evaluated with a checklist developed by the researchers.

resultsA total of 78 videos in English, 63 in Japanese, and 99 in Chinese were analyzed. The types of sources were as follows: 6.4% in English, 4.8% in Japanese, and 57.6% in Chinese for health professionals; 93.6% in English, 95.2% in Japanese, and 3.0% in Chinese for private users; none in English and Japanese, but 39.4% in Chinese for other sources. In all, 20.5% in English, 17.5% in Japanese, and 93.9% in Chinese of videos had useful information about gastric cancer. Among the useful videos, the videos published in Chinese had the highest QUEST(p < 0.05) and DISCERN scores(p < 0.05), followed by those published in Japanese. Among the educational videos, prognosis in English (37.5%), symptoms in Japanese (54.5%), and prevention in Chinese (47.3%) were the most frequently covered topic.

conclusionsTikTok in English and Japanese might not fully meet the gastric cancer information needs of public, but Douyin in Chinese was the opposite.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSocial MediaHumansInformation DisseminationLanguageVideo RecordingGastric cancer; Social media; Public health; Content analysis

Identifiers

PMID36335401
PMCPMC9636631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.