ArticleBMC public health2022
Quality and accuracy of gastric cancer related videos in social media videos platforms.
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Quality and content evaluation of anal fistula information on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Can social media videos meet patients' information needs for benign prostatic hyperplasia? A repeated cross-sectional study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- The quality and scope of health information on online drug platforms: a topic modelling and expert evaluation study of a Polish-language forum.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Evaluating the information quality and reliability of ovarian cancer educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of knee osteoarthritis-related information on short video platforms in China: a multi-method cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of irritable bowel syndrome-related medical information on major video platforms in China: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- BiliBili, Douyin and Xiaohongshu as health information platforms for stroke: evaluating information quality and content.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Assessment of information quality and reliability on ankle sprains in short videos from Douyin and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Qualitative research on undergraduate nursing students' recognition and response to short videos' health disinformation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Myopia information on TikTok: analysis factors that impact video quality and audience engagement.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Health information-seeking experience in people with head and neck neoplasms undergoing treatment: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Current status of short video as a source of information on lung cancer: a cross-sectional content analysis study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A content analysis of YouTube videos on palliative care: understanding the quality and availability of online resources.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- The status quo of short videos as a source of health information regarding bowel preparation before colonoscopy.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer is a major public health problem worldwide. Social media has affected public's daily lives in ways no one ever thought possible. Both TikoTok and its Chinese version Douyin are the most popular short video posting platform. This study aimed to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and completeness of videos for gastric cancer on TikTok and Douyin.
methodsThe terms "gastric cancer" was searched on TikTok in both English and Japanese, and on Douyin in Chinese. The first 100 videos in three languages (website's default setting) were checked. QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and DISCERN as the instrument for assessing the quality of the information in each video. Content was analysed under six categories (aetiology, anatomy, symptoms, preventions, treatments, and prognosis). The educational value and completeness were evaluated with a checklist developed by the researchers.
resultsA total of 78 videos in English, 63 in Japanese, and 99 in Chinese were analyzed. The types of sources were as follows: 6.4% in English, 4.8% in Japanese, and 57.6% in Chinese for health professionals; 93.6% in English, 95.2% in Japanese, and 3.0% in Chinese for private users; none in English and Japanese, but 39.4% in Chinese for other sources. In all, 20.5% in English, 17.5% in Japanese, and 93.9% in Chinese of videos had useful information about gastric cancer. Among the useful videos, the videos published in Chinese had the highest QUEST(p < 0.05) and DISCERN scores(p < 0.05), followed by those published in Japanese. Among the educational videos, prognosis in English (37.5%), symptoms in Japanese (54.5%), and prevention in Chinese (47.3%) were the most frequently covered topic.
conclusionsTikTok in English and Japanese might not fully meet the gastric cancer information needs of public, but Douyin in Chinese was the opposite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.