Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335373›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Applying concepts from "rapid" and "agile" implementation to advance implementation research.

Andrew Quanbeck, Rose Garza Hennessy, Linda Park

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling.Frontiers in health services · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 in Western Australia: 'The last straw' and hopes for a 'new normal' for parents of children with long-term conditions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew QuanbeckDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Drive, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. andrew.quanbeck@fammed.wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-4804
Rose Garza HennessyJoseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53205, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3566-9631
Linda ParkDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Drive, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-343X

Funding

Promoting the implementation of clinical guidelines for opioid prescribing in primary care using systems consultationR01DA047279 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Integrating mHealth for Alcohol Use Disorders into Clinical PracticeR01AA024150 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI QUANBECK, ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1R01AA024150-01A1Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1R01DA047279-01NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024150NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe translation of research findings into practice can be improved to maximize benefits more quickly and with greater flexibility. To expedite translation, researchers have developed innovative approaches to implementation branded as "rapid" and "agile" implementation. Rapid implementation has roots in precision medicine and agile implementation has roots in systems engineering and software design. Research has shown that innovation often derives from learning and applying ideas that have impacted other fields. IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCHERS: This commentary examines "rapid" and "agile" approaches to implementation and provides recommendations to implementation researchers stemming from these approaches. Four key ideas are synthesized that may be broadly applicable to implementation research, including (1) adopting a problem orientation, (2) applying lessons from behavioral economics, (3) using adaptive study designs and adaptive interventions, and (4) using multi-level models to guide implementation. Examples are highlighted from the field where researchers are applying these key ideas to illustrate their potential impact.

conclusions"Rapid" and "agile" implementation approaches to implementation stem from diverse fields. Elements of these approaches show potential for advancing implementation research, although adopting them may entail shifting scientific norms in the field.

Indexed as

Agile implementationBehavioral economicsComplex systemsRapid implementationSystems engineering

Identifiers

PMID36335373
PMCPMC9636827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.