ArticleBMC oral health2022
The correlation between two occlusal analyzers for the measurement of bite force.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-Related Differences in Maximum Bite Force, Occlusal Contact Area and Bite Pressure in Healthy Young Asian Adults.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- From Paper to Pixels-A Narrative Review of Occlusal Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Digital Analysis of Occlusal Contacts in Angle Class II and Class III Malocclusion.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
- Functional and craniofacial characteristics in patients with coexisting pain-related temporomandibular disorders and probable sleep bruxism: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The effect of osteoporosis medication on bite force in older adults: a prospective clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Hemophilic Pseudotumor of the Maxilla Secondary to Endodontic Treatment: Case Report and Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Children with unilateral molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) may exhibit contralateral temporalis and masseter muscle hyperactivity: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025Observational
- Oral function improvement through oral exercise: gender differences in community-dwelling older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Non-pathological facial asymmetry in adult women: an approach to bite force, occlusal contact distribution and masticatory muscle thickness.Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry and its association to occlusal and muscular imbalance in young women.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Validation of a New Measuring Instrument for the Assessment of Bite Force.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of occlusal bite force distribution by T-Scan in orthodontic patients with different occlusal characteristics: a cross sectional-observational study.BMC oral health · 2023Observational
- Improvements in Maximum Bite Force with Gum-Chewing Training in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Correlation of masticatory muscle activity and occlusal function with craniofacial morphology: a prospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Construction of a novel digital method for quantitative analysis of occlusal contact and force.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Evaluation of masticatory function in the pediatric and adult populations with Treacher Collins syndrome.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOcclusal force represents masticatory function. Using quantifiable occlusal indicators provides a more objective occlusal force evaluation. In the recent dental practice, digital methods such as the Dental Prescale II (DP2, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and T-scan (T-Scan III v8; Tekscan Inc.) are commonly used in clinics to evaluate treatment outcomes. The T-scan provides the relative bite force (%) compared to the maximal bite force on individual teeth or the unilateral arch. The DP2 can quantify occlusal force, measured in newtons (N), on the half arch or the overall bite, but it is difficult to identify the bite force on an individual tooth. It is difficult to select a device that fulfils all the requirements to record occlusal force. This study aimed to investigate the association between the bite measured by the DPS2 and T-scan to determine whether the measured bite force is comparable through calculation.
methodsA total of 80 healthy adults, including 41 women and 39 men with a mean age of 38.2, were requested to bite pressure sensitive film sheets ten minutes apart. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the measured bite force by the DP2 and T-scan.
resultsThere was a significant positive correlation between the occlusal force measured by the DP2 and T-scan (P < 0.01) when intercept was equal to zero as confounders were adjused. These results provided the comparability of the measured occlusal forces determined by the DP2 and T-scan.
conclusionThe estimated bite force determined by DP2 and T-Scan is convertible using the linear equation from this study to increase the value for clinical applications. The estimated bite force from the two quantifiable occlusal indicators are comparable. The two commercially available quantifiable occlusal indicators can be fully adapted to all clinical requirements according to this result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.