Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335336›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

The correlation between two occlusal analyzers for the measurement of bite force.

Yi-Fang Huang, Chin-Man Wang, Wann-Yun Shieh, Yu-Fang Liao, Hsiang-Hsi Hong, Chung-Ta Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Children with unilateral molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) may exhibit contralateral temporalis and masseter muscle hyperactivity: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Fang HuangDepartment of General Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 33305, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chin-Man WangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 33305, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wann-Yun ShiehDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, College of Engineering, Chang Gung University, 33302, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Fang LiaoDepartment of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 10507, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Hsi HongGraduate Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 33302, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chung-Ta ChangSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, 11031, Taipei, Taiwan. chungta2001@gmail.com.
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWTaoyuan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOcclusal force represents masticatory function. Using quantifiable occlusal indicators provides a more objective occlusal force evaluation. In the recent dental practice, digital methods such as the Dental Prescale II (DP2, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and T-scan (T-Scan III v8; Tekscan Inc.) are commonly used in clinics to evaluate treatment outcomes. The T-scan provides the relative bite force (%) compared to the maximal bite force on individual teeth or the unilateral arch. The DP2 can quantify occlusal force, measured in newtons (N), on the half arch or the overall bite, but it is difficult to identify the bite force on an individual tooth. It is difficult to select a device that fulfils all the requirements to record occlusal force. This study aimed to investigate the association between the bite measured by the DPS2 and T-scan to determine whether the measured bite force is comparable through calculation.

methodsA total of 80 healthy adults, including 41 women and 39 men with a mean age of 38.2, were requested to bite pressure sensitive film sheets ten minutes apart. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the measured bite force by the DP2 and T-scan.

resultsThere was a significant positive correlation between the occlusal force measured by the DP2 and T-scan (P < 0.01) when intercept was equal to zero as confounders were adjused. These results provided the comparability of the measured occlusal forces determined by the DP2 and T-scan.

conclusionThe estimated bite force determined by DP2 and T-Scan is convertible using the linear equation from this study to increase the value for clinical applications. The estimated bite force from the two quantifiable occlusal indicators are comparable. The two commercially available quantifiable occlusal indicators can be fully adapted to all clinical requirements according to this result.

Indexed as

Bite ForceToothAdultDental OcclusionFemaleHumansJapanLinear ModelsMaleBiteOcclusal forceOcclusal indicatorPressure sensitive film sheetQuantify

Identifiers

PMID36335336
PMCPMC9636614
OpenAlexW4308239180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.