Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335322›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Final year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students' perspectives on simulation-based education: a cross-sectional study.

Mairead Moloney, Louise Murphy, Liz Kingston, Kathleen Markey, Therese Hennessy, Pauline Meskell, Sandra Atkinson, Owen Doody

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06116448 (The Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education on Nursing Students' Breastfeeding Knowledge, Skills, Confidence, and Satisfaction.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06116448 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education on Nursing Students' Breastfeeding Knowledge, Skills, Confidence, and Satisfaction.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEge UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsBreastfeedingArmshigh-fidelity simulation, hybrid simulation, telesimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mairead MoloneyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. mairead.moloney@ul.ie.
Louise MurphyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Liz KingstonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Kathleen MarkeyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Therese HennessyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Pauline MeskellDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Sandra AtkinsonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Owen DoodyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based education is a teaching and learning approach that can enhance learning experiences for students on healthcare programmes. Within undergraduate nursing and midwifery education, simulation can support students in developing graduate attributes necessary to become practice-ready professionals. This paper reports on the evaluation of a simulation-based education initiative, which was introduced to support final year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students in preparation for their upcoming clinical internship in practice.

methodsThis study aimed to evaluate a simulation-based education initiative from the perspectives of final year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students (N = 95). An online survey, using the validated Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M), was distributed to final year nursing and midwifery students at one university in Ireland. This study was conducted and reported in line with the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).

resultsThe results of the study highlight final year nursing and midwifery students' perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction with learning in a simulated environment. Students reported their simulation-based learning experiences as worthwhile, motivating, and as important opportunities to build on previous learning, increase confidence and gain experience in preparation for real-life practice. Students reported feeling more confident in their assessment skills, in providing care and interventions in responding to changes in a person's health status. All students reported that the simulation-based learning experiences enabled them to think more critically about the clinical case scenarios and critically question their actions and decision-making processes. Pre-briefing and debriefing sessions were highlighted as important aspects of the simulation which helped to increase student confidence and cultivate meaningful learning.

conclusionSimulation-based education is a valuable teaching and learning modality, particularly for final year students who are transitioning to real-life clinical practice. Student-centred simulation-based learning experiences can cultivate professional development and support learners in their transition from university student to healthcare professional.

Indexed as

Nursing and midwifery educationSimulation-based educationSimulation-based learning experienceStudent-centred

Identifiers

PMID36335322
PMCPMC9637299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.