Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335227›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Kidney segmentation from DCE-MRI converging level set methods, fuzzy clustering and Markov random field modeling.

Moumen El-Melegy, Rasha Kamel, Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed Shehata, Fahmi Khalifa, Ayman El-Baz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moumen El-MelegyElectrical Engineering Department, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. moumen@aun.edu.eg.
Rasha KamelComputer Science Department, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed Abou El-GharRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed ShehataBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Fahmi KhalifaBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Ayman El-BazBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Funding

Science and Technology Development Fund USC 17:253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of transplanted kidney function requires precise Kidney segmentation from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging images as a preliminary step. In this regard, this paper aims to propose an automated and accurate DCE-MRI kidney segmentation method integrating fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering and Markov random field modeling into a level set formulation. The fuzzy memberships, kidney's shape prior model, and spatial interactions modeled using a second-order MRF guide the LS contour evolution towards the target kidney. Several experiments on real medical data of 45 subjects have shown that the proposed method can achieve high and consistent segmentation accuracy regardless of where the LS contour was initialized. It achieves an accuracy of 0.956 ± 0.019 in Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 1.15 ± 1.46 in 95% percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Our quantitative comparisons confirm the superiority of the proposed method over several LS methods with an average improvement of more than 0.63 in terms of HD95. It also offers HD95 improvements of 9.62 and 3.94 over two deep neural networks based on the U-Net model. The accuracy improvements are experimentally found to be more profound on low-contrast images as well as DCE-MRI images with high noise levels.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingCluster AnalysisHumansKidney

Identifiers

PMID36335227
PMCPMC9637091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.