Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335159›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A systematic investigation reveals that Ishihara et al.'s (2008) STEARC effect only emerges when time is directly assessed.

Alberto Mariconda, Valter Prpic, Serena Mingolo, Fabrizio Sors, Tiziano Agostini, Mauro Murgia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A SNARC-like effect for visual speed.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto Mariconda *Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. alberto.mariconda@phd.units.it.
Valter Prpic *Department of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. valter.prpic@unibo.it.
Serena MingoloDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Fabrizio SorsDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Tiziano AgostiniDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Mauro Murgia *Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. mauromurgia@units.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Spatial-TEmporal Association of Response Codes (STEARC) effect (Ishihara et al. in Cortex 44:454-461, 2008) is evidence that time is spatially coded along the horizontal axis. It consists in faster left-hand responses to early onset timing and faster right-hand responses to late onset timing. This effect has only been established using tasks that directly required to assess onset timing, while no studies investigated whether this association occurs automatically in the auditory modality. The current study investigated the occurrence of the STEARC effect by using a procedure similar to Ishihara and colleagues. Experiment 1 was a conceptual replication of the original study, in which participants directly discriminated the onset timing (early vs. late) of a target sound after listening to a sequence of auditory clicks. This experiment successfully replicated the STEARC effect and revealed that the onset timing is mapped categorically. In Experiments 2, 3a and 3b participants were asked to discriminate the timbre of the stimuli instead of directly assessing the onset timing. In these experiments, no STEARC effect was observed. This suggests that the auditory STEARC effect is only elicited when time is explicitly processed, thus questioning the automaticity of this phenomenon.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID36335159
PMCPMC9637157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.