Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335150›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys.

Erica A Geldart, Andrew F Barnas, Christina A D Semeniuk, H Grant Gilchrist, Christopher M Harris, Oliver P Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erica A GeldartGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada. geldart@uwindsor.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-8906
Andrew F BarnasGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada. andrew.f.barnas@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0990-4666
Christina A D SemeniukGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-9853
H Grant GilchristNational Wildlife Research Center, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-5092
Christopher M HarrisDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3634-5196
Oliver P LoveDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-6411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders.

Indexed as

DucksUnmanned Aerial DevicesAnimalsAnimals, WildAquatic OrganismsBirdsFemale

Identifiers

PMID36335150
PMCPMC9637139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.