Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36334923›Full record

ArticleSocial science research2022

Pregnancy scares, pregnancy uncertainty, and abortion attitude change.

Lauren Newmyer, Scott T Yabiku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren NewmyerDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and the Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, United States. Electronic address: lun148@psu.edu.
Scott T YabikuDepartment of Sociology and Criminology and the Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, United States.

Funding

Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHNSON, DAVID R · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Training Program in Social Environments and Population HealthT32HD007514 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI JOHN D. ICELAND · 1999 to 2026
$5.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's attitudes towards abortion are often assessed infrequently in their lives. This measurement may not capture how lifetime events, such as reproductive experiences, potentially influence attitudes towards abortion. Although reproductive attitudes can fluctuate with life's circumstances, there is little research on how abortion attitudes may change when a woman suspects she might be pregnant. Using an intensive longitudinal dataset collected in Michigan, the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study (2008-2012), we test the relationship between the timing of pregnancy scares and uncertainty and abortion attitudes using hybrid effects models. We find that women become less supportive of abortion while experiencing a pregnancy scare or uncertainty; however, this association exists only during a scare or uncertainty. These findings highlight that abortion attitudes may change when a woman suspects she might be pregnant. However, attitudinal change may not last past this period.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitudeFearFemaleHumansPregnancyUncertaintyAbortionAbortion attitudesPregnancy scaresPregnancy uncertaintyReproductive healthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36334923
PMCPMC10425883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.