Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36334611›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Public health2022

Firearm injury-a preventable public health issue.

Jay Patel, Katherine Leach-Kemon, Gwenetta Curry, Mohsen Naghavi, Devi Sridhar

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The epidemiology and deprivation profile of firearm-related injuries and deaths in British Columbia, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jay PatelGlobal Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: patelj01@outlook.com.
Katherine Leach-KemonInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Gwenetta CurryGlobal Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mohsen NaghaviInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Devi SridharGlobal Health Governance Programme, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106635/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firearm-related injury is a leading cause of death disproportionately affecting adolescents and young adults across the world, especially in the Americas. Little progress has been made over the past four decades, as inaction and the adoption of ineffective or unevidenced interventions have become commonplace. The COVID-19 pandemic reconfigured health systems towards prevention and harm reduction, sharpened public attention to the burden of preventable deaths, and inspired a fresh ambition of eliminating avertable deaths. In this Viewpoint, we argue that preventing firearm injury should garner bolder action in post-pandemic public health and we present a case for reducing the global burden of firearm injury supported by evidence and international examples. Crucially, we aim to guide policy making in directions that end the cycle of grief, anger, activism, deflection, and inaction and create more peaceful and fairer societies.

Indexed as

COVID-19FirearmsWounds, GunshotAdolescentHumansPandemicsPublic HealthUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36334611
PMCPMC9646976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.