ArticleColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces2023
Effect of surface stiffness in initial adhesion of oral microorganisms under various environmental conditions.
Article in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Catheter mechanoprophylaxis againstMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- Strategies and applications of antibacterial surface-modified biomaterials.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- In Vitro Microbial Adhesion on the Surfaces of Various Polytetrafluoroethylene Membranes Used in Guided Bone Regeneration.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Bacterial Adhesion on Soft Surfaces: The Dual Role of Substrate Stiffness and Bacterial Growth Stage.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biofilms are three-dimensional structures formed as a result of microorganism's adhesion on a biotic or abiotic surface. Once a biofilm is established, it is onerous to eradicate it or kill the pathogens therein. Thus, targeting the microbial adhesion process, the initial stage of biofilm formation, is a reasonable approach to avoid challenges associated with subsequently formed biofilms. While many properties of interacting material that play significant roles in initial bacterial adhesion have been widely studied, the effect of surface stiffness on bacterial adhesion was relatively underexplored. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of surface stiffness on the adhesion of microbial species found in the oral cavity by employing representative oral bacteria, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus oralis, and the fungus, Candida albicans. We compared the adhesion behavior of these species alone or in combination toward various surface stiffness (0.06 - 3.01 MPa) by assessing the adhered and planktonic cell numbers at an early (4 h) adhesion stage under various carbon sources and the presence of conditioning film. Our data revealed that in general, a higher amount of microbial cells adhered to softer PDMS surfaces than stiffer ones, which indicates that surface stiffness plays a role in the adhesion of tested species (either single or co-cultured). This pattern was more obvious under sucrose conditions than glucose + fructose conditions. Interestingly, in monospecies, saliva coating did not alter the effect of surface stiffness on S. mutans adhesion while it diminished S. oralis and C. albicans adhesion. However, in the multispecies model, saliva coating rendered the percentage of all adhered microbes to varied PDMS not distinct. The data provide new insights into the role of surface stiffness on microbial mechanosensing and their initial adhesion behavior which may set a scientific foundation for future anti-adhesion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.