ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2023
Evaluation of respiratory function in healthcare workers wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological responses to mask-associated COFrontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Correlation between use of different type protective facemasks and the oral ecosystem.BMC public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID pandemic, which has caused high mortality rates worldwide, has mainly affected the working environment of healthcare workers. Metabolic and respiratory changes occur in healthcare workers working with surgical masks.
objectiveOur aim is to identify the metabolic and respiratory problems faced by healthcare personnel working with surgical masks and to produce solutions to minimize them.
methodsThe study was conducted among emergency service workers who used surgical masks for at least 8 h in the emergency room between June 2020 and July 2020. Venous blood gas samples were taken from the health personnel participating in the study and their vital signs were checked.
resultA total of 60 healthcare professionals with a mean age of 28.20 ± 6.30 years were included in the study. The distribution of men and women in the study was balanced with 30 (50.0%) men and 30 (50.0%) women. When the first and last vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, saturation) of the health workers participating in the study were examined, no statistically significant differences were found (p > 0.05). While there was no statistically significant difference in the Na, Chlorine, Ca values of metabolic indicators (p > 0.05), the first measurements of K (0.017) and Lactate (0.037) values were found to be higher than the last measurements (p > 0.05). The first measurements of the respiratory parameters pH (0.002), pCO2 (0.028), sO2 (0.045) and pO2 (0.048) were lower than the last measurements (p > 0.05). The first measurement value of pCO2 (0.028) was found to be higher than the last (p > 0.05).
conclusionsRegular and long-term use of surgical masks does not harm the body metabolically and respiratorily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.