ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2023
Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy-Based Biomolecular Alterations for the Diagnosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Adults: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Value of deep learning model for predicting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 and 4A lesions on mammography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Biennial Mammography Performance in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program From 2009 to 2020.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Concordant and discordant breast density patterns by different approaches for assessing breast density and breast cancer risk.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Article
- Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScreening mammography performance among young women remains uncertain in East Asia, where the proportion of young breast cancer patients is higher than that in Western countries. Thus, we analyzed the performance of screening mammography in women under 40 years in comparison with older age groups.
methodsThis retrospective study comprised 95,431 Asian women with 197,525 screening mammograms. The reference standard was determined by linkage to the national cancer registry data and the 12-month follow-up outcomes after the index mammogram. The performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value (PPV), recall rate, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), with comparisons across age groups (30 s, 40 s, and ≥ 50 s).
resultsFor young women aged < 40 years, sensitivity and AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of screening mammography were 60.4% (50.4-69.7) and 0.73 (0.68-0.77), respectively, with no significant difference compared to women in their 40 s (sensitivity: 64.0% [95% CI: 57.8-69.8], P = 0.52; AUC: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.73-0.78], P = 0.35). The CDR (95% CI) was 0.8 (0.6-1.1) per 1,000 mammograms for young women, poorer than 1.8 (1.6-2.1) per 1,000 mammograms for women in their 40 s (P < 0.001). The PPV and recall rate (95% CI) for young women were 0.6% (0.4-0.7) and 14.9% (14.6-15.1), poorer than 1.4% (1.2-1.6) and 13.3% (13.1-13.5) for women in their 40 s (P < 0.001), respectively.
conclusionThe accuracy of screening mammography for young women in their 30 s was not significantly different from that for women in their 40 s, but the cancer detection and recall rates were poorer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36334183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.