Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36334165›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2023

Machine learning prediction of empirical polarity using SMILES encoding of organic solvents.

Vaneet Saini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vaneet SainiDepartment of Chemistry & Centre for Advanced Studies in Chemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India. vsaini@pu.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-5166

Funding

Department of Science and Technology DST/INSPIRE/04/2017/002529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning based statistical models have played a significant role in increasing the speed and accuracy with which the chemical and physical properties of chemical compounds can be predicted as compared to the experimental, and traditional ab initio and quantum mechanical approaches. The transformative impact that these techniques have, in the field of chemical sciences has completely changed the way experiments are designed. The last decade has seen the prominence of computer-aided molecular design based on machine learning algorithms. The major challenge has been the generation of machine-readable data in the form of descriptors and observations for training the model, which can again be time-consuming and computationally expensive if atomic coordinates based molecular encoding approach is used. In this study, we have tried to solve this problem using SMILES representation of molecules for generating various topological, physicochemical, electronic and steric descriptors using open-source cheminformatics packages. With the aid of the data generated using these packages, we have been able to develop a simple and explainable quantitative structure property relationship model using artificial neural network based on 7 numerical descriptors and 1 categorical descriptor for predicting the empirical polarity of a wide diversity of organic solvents. Since polarity is the representation of various solute-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions taking place in an organic transformation, its intuition beforehand will definitely help a chemist in a better experimental design. An ANN algorithm based on 8 descriptors was successfully employed to predict the E

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerMachine LearningQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipSolventsSolventsArtificial neural networkEmpirical polarityMachine learningOrganic solventsSMILES

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.