ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2022
Psychometric evaluation of the Urgency NRS as a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03518086 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Induction Study of Mirikizumab in Conventional-Failed and Biologic-Failed Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Induction Study of Mirikizumab in Conventional-Failed and Biologic-Failed Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (LUCENT 1)
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mirikizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Chinese Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Subpopulation Analysis of the Randomized, Global Phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 Trials.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Trial
- Mirikizumab four-year sustained and durable efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis: Final findings from the LUCENT-3 open-label extension study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Trial
- Mirikizumab is associated with rapid and sustained improvements in novel measures of bowel urgency in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis: 28-week results from the LUCENT-URGE trial.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Trial
- Three-Year Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 152 Weeks of Continuous Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Trial
- Bowel urgency in ulcerative colitis: effect of baseline urgency and change in urgency in response to mirikizumab.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Trial
- The Urgency Numeric Rating Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in Adults with Crohn's Disease.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Two-Year Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 104 Weeks of Continuous Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Trial
- Early and Sustained Symptom Control with Mirikizumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in the Phase 3 LUCENT Programme.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Isolated Proctitis: Results From the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of vedolizumab to reduce bowel urgency in a Canadian real-world inflammatory bowel disease cohort.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Response to meeting STRIDE-II targets in routine practice: Assessment, access, and service design.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026Article
- Bowel urgency in inflammatory bowel disease: A concept analysis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- Bowel urgency in ulcerative colitis is associated with clinical endpoints, health-related quality of life, and biomarkers: data from the etrasimod ELEVATE UC 52 trial.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Combined bowel urgency, clinical outcomes, and quality of life improvement in mirikizumab-treated ulcerative colitis: a step toward comprehensive disease management.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Bowel Urgency Improvement Correlates With Clinical, Biochemical, and Intestinal Ultrasound Improvements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross Sectional Multicenter Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Current Measures and Future Directions.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Impact of Vedolizumab on Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis: Post Hoc Analysis of the GEMINI 1, VISIBLE 1, and VARSITY Trials.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Bowel Urgency in Crohn's Disease: Bridging the Gap Between Patients and Healthcare Providers.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Exploring patient-reported outcome measures to assess symptoms of moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease in adult and adolescent patients: a qualitative study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Broad Impact of Bowel Urgency in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: US, European, and Japanese Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives from the Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was developed as a content-valid single-item patient-reported outcome measure to assess severity of bowel urgency. Here, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Urgency NRS.
methodsData were from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (NCT03518086). Patients completed the Urgency NRS using a daily electronic diary, from which weekly average Urgency NRS scores were calculated. Test-retest reliability, known-groups validity, construct validity, responsiveness, and score interpretation were assessed using the modified Mayo score, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), Patient Global Rating of Severity (PGRS), Patient Global Rating of Change (PGRC), and Geboes score.
resultsThe study sample comprised 1,162 participants (40.2% female). Mean Urgency NRS score was higher (worse) at baseline than at week 12 (6.2 vs. 3.7). Test-retest reliability was strong, with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.76-0.89. Baseline least-square mean Urgency NRS score was higher for participants with a PGRS score greater than the median (worse symptoms) than for those with a PGRS score less than or equal to the median (7.5 vs. 5.4; p < 0.0001), indicating good known-groups validity. Urgency NRS score was moderately correlated with IBDQ total and domain scores, PGRS, PGRC, and modified Mayo stool frequency, establishing its convergent validity. Correlations were weak for Geboes score and weak to moderate for modified Mayo endoscopic subscore and modified Mayo rectal bleeding, indicating that the Urgency NRS also had discriminant validity. Patients achieving clinical remission, clinical response, IBDQ remission, and PGRS score improvement showed significantly greater improvement on the Urgency NRS (p < 0.0001 for all), demonstrating responsiveness to change. A ≥ 3-point improvement in Urgency NRS score represented a meaningful improvement in bowel urgency and an Urgency NRS score of ≤ 1 point represented a bowel urgency remission threshold that was closely associated with clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission.
conclusionsThe Urgency NRS is a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure that is suitable for evaluating treatment benefits in clinical trials in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.