Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36334157›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Supportive therapies in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and appropriate use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: a Delphi consensus statement.

Vincenzo Adamo, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Marco Danova, Michelino De Laurentiis, Paolo Marchetti, Carmine Pinto, Giovanni Rosti

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo AdamoDepartment of Human Pathology, Scientific Direction of Oncology, University of Messina, A.O. Papardo, Messina, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-2418
Lorenzo AntonuzzoClinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3349-5604
Marco DanovaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, ASST of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-1572
Paolo MarchettiIstituto Dermopatico Dell'Immacolata, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-8761
Carmine PintoMedical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AULS-IRRCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-5268
Giovanni RostiMedical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy. rosti.giovanni@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2097-2803
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData indicate that the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in routine practice is not consistent with guideline recommendations. The initiative "supportive care for febrile neutropenia prevention and appropriateness of G-CFS use" was undertaken to address the issue of inappropriate prescription of G-CSFs and to improve guideline adherence in the treatment of FN.

methodsIn a two-round Delphi procedure, 36 medical oncologists reviewed clinically relevant recommendations on risk assessment, the appropriate use of G-CSFs, and the prevention of FN based on available literature and individual clinical expertise.

resultsThe consensus was reached on 16 out of 38 recommendations, which are backed by evidence from randomised clinical trials and routine clinical practice. The medical oncologists agreed that the severity of neutropenia depends on patients' characteristics and chemotherapy intensity, and therefore, the risk of severe neutropenia or FN should be assessed at each chemotherapy cycle so as to initiate prophylaxis with G-CSFs if required. The use of biosimilar G-CSFs, with similar efficacy and safety profiles to the originator biologic, has improved the availability and sustainability of cancer care. The timing of supportive therapy is crucial; for example, long-acting G-CSF should be administered 24-72 h after chemotherapy administration. Each biological agent has a recommended administration dose and duration, and it is important to follow these recommendations to avoid complications associated with under-prophylaxis.

conclusionIt is hoped that these statements will help to increase adherence to guideline recommendations for appropriate G-CSF use and improve patient care.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaFebrile NeutropeniaNeoplasmsDelphi TechniqueGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocytesHumansGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorChemotherapyConsensusFebrile neutropeniaGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorSupportive therapy

Identifiers

PMID36334157
PMCPMC9715510
OpenAlexW4308255811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.