Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36334026›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2023

Use of long-term services and supports among dual-eligible beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Hyunjee Kim, Angela Senders, Erika Simeon, Cesar Juarez, Sean Huang, Hiroko Dodge, K John McConnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyunjee KimCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-7184
Angela SendersCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Erika SimeonCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5394-1096
Cesar JuarezCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Sean HuangDepartment of Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Hiroko DodgeDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
K John McConnellCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Moderating effects of Medicaid long-term care services on heat wave-associated outcomes among people living with dementiaRF1AG069782 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, HYUNJEE · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG069782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo respect people's preference for aging in place and control costs, many state Medicaid programs have enacted policies to expand home and community-based services as an alternative to nursing facility care. However, little is known about the use of Medicaid long-term services and supports (LTSS) at a national level, particularly among dual-eligible beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

methodsUsing Medicare and Medicaid claims of 30 states from 2016, we focused on dual-eligible beneficiaries 65 years or older with ADRD and described their use of any form of LTSS and sub-types of LTSS (home-based, community-based, and nursing facility services) across states.

resultsWe found that 80.5% of dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD received some form of Medicaid LTSS in 2016. The most common LTSS setting was nursing facility (46.7%), followed by home (31.5%) and community (12.2%). There was sizeable state variation in the percentage of dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD who used any form of LTSS (ranging from 61% in Maine to 96% in Montana). The type of LTSS used also varied widely across states. For example, home-based service use ranged from 9% in Maine, Arizona, and South Dakota to 62% in Oregon. Nursing facility services were the most common type of LTSS in most states. However, home-based service use exceeded nursing facility use in Oregon, Alaska, and California.

conclusionsOur findings suggest substantially different use of LTSS across states among dual-eligible beneficiaries with ADRD. Given the importance of LTSS for this population and their families, a deeper understanding of state LTSS policies and other factors that contribute to wide state variation in LTSS use will be necessary to improve access to LTSS across states.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHome Care ServicesAgedHumansIndependent LivingLong-Term CareMedicaidMedicareUnited Statesdual-eligible beneficiarieslong-term services and supportspeople with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias

Identifiers

PMID36334026
PMCPMC9957784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.