ArticleClinical and translational science2023
ST2 and CSF-1 as potential druggable targets of inflammatory bowel diseases: Results from two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum and synovial fluid levels of CSF-1 and in knee osteoarthritis and its clinical significance.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- M-CSF Protects Against Ulcerative Colitis via Aconitate: Mendelian Randomization and Experimental Evidence.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Protein-centric omics integration analysis identifies candidate plasma proteins for multiple autoimmune diseases.Human genetics · 2024Article
- Mendelian randomisation analysis for intestinal disease: achievement and future.eGastroenterology · 2024Review
- ST2 and CSF-1 as potential druggable targets of inflammatory bowel diseases: Results from two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel druggable targets are warranted for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. We aimed to identify novel circulating proteins with causal associations with the risk of IBDs and provide potential therapeutic targets for IBD treatment. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the associations of 55 circulating biomarkers on the risk of IBD, Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC) by leveraging the summary statistics from large genomewide association studies and protein quantitative trait loci studies. The individual estimate was pooled together by meta-analyses to estimate the causal effects of each outcome. In univariable MR, we identified several circulating proteins showed potential correlation with IBD, UC, and CD. Of note, we observed that a genetically proxied increased level of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) was associated with an elevated risk of IBD (odds ratios [ORs] 1.133, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.091-1.176, p < 0.0001), CD (ORs 1.188, 95% CI 1.103-1.281, p < 0.0001), and UC cohorts (ORs 1.087, 95% CI 1.050-1.125, p < 0.0001). Additionally, we observed a consistent positive correlation between the level of CSF-1 and the increased risk of IBD in individual MR, with statistically significant causal associations in the meta-analyses with ORs equal to 1.217 (IBD, 95% CI 1.115-1.328, p < 0.0001), 1.223 (CD, 95% CI 1.082-1.382, p = 0.0013), and 1.179 (UC, 95% CI 1.055-1.317, p = 0.0037). This study provided evidence for potential casual associations between circulating ST2 and CSF-1 levels, and increased risks of IBD, UC, and CD, implicating potential treatment targets for IBD and subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.