Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333950›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2023

Microbiome assembly and maintenance across the lifespan of bumble bee workers.

Tobin J Hammer, August Easton-Calabria, Nancy A Moran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A culture collection of gut bacteria from wild bumble bees (Microbiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobin J HammerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-8440
August Easton-CalabriaDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Nancy A MoranDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-9769
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Elucidating the molecular bases of species interactions in host-associated bacterial communitiesR35GM131738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MORAN, NANCY A. · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2018-08156NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131738NIH HHS R35GM131738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How a host's microbiome changes over its lifespan can influence development and ageing. As these temporal patterns have only been described in detail for a handful of hosts, an important next step is to compare microbiome succession more broadly and investigate why it varies. Here we characterize the temporal dynamics and stability of the bumble bee worker gut microbiome. Bumble bees have simple and host-specific gut microbiomes, and their microbial dynamics may influence health and pollination services. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing, quantitative PCR and metagenomics to characterize gut microbiomes over the lifespan of Bombus impatiens workers. We also sequenced gut transcriptomes to examine host factors that may control the microbiome. At the community level, microbiome assembly is highly predictable and similar to patterns of primary succession observed in the human gut. However, at the strain level, partitioning of bacterial variants among colonies suggests stochastic colonization events similar to those observed in flies and nematodes. We also find strong differences in temporal dynamics among symbiont species, suggesting ecological differences among microbiome members in colonization and persistence. Finally, we show that both the gut microbiome and host transcriptome-including expression of key immunity genes-stabilize, as opposed to senesce, with age. We suggest that in highly social groups such as bumble bees, maintenance of both microbiomes and immunity contribute to inclusive fitness, and thus remain under selection even in old age. Our findings provide a foundation for exploring the mechanisms and functional outcomes of bee microbiome succession.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBeesHumansLongevityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SageingBombusgut microbiotaimmunitysenescencetemporal dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36333950
PMCPMC9871002
OpenAlexW4308224633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.