Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333812›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Prevalence and influence factors of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids in registered Chinese nurses: a national cross-sectional study.

Lihui Zhang, Qi Li, Ling Guan, Lu Fan, Yunxia Li, Zhiyun Zhang, Sue Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lihui ZhangTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Qi LiXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Ling GuanXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Lu FanXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Yunxia LiXiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Zhiyun ZhangNursing Department, Beijing Ditan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100015, China. zzy1968chn@163.com.
Sue YuanTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. ldyse2018@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-4869
Central South University · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

the foundation of innovation project of science and technology of hunan province 2017SK50107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOccupational exposure to blood and body fluids poses a threat to medical providers and to nurses especially. This harm is not only physical, but psychology as well and can ultimately impact patient safety. This study aims to understand the prevalence of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among Chinese registered nurses and explores the factors that influence this exposure.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted for 31 province-level divisions in China, using a self-created questionnaire entitled Status Survey on Occupational Exposure in Nurses. Descriptive statistics were used to describe both the demographic characteristics of the respondents and the characteristics of occupational exposure. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentage, and the relationship between possible influential factors and the occurrence of occupational exposure was determined using binary logistic regression.

resultsOut of a total of 20,791 nurses analyzed, over half (52.1%) of them had experienced occupational exposure to blood or body fluids, but over 1/3 (34.6%) of them did not ever report their exposures to a supervisor/official. The top three causes of under-reporting were: the source patient failed to test positive for infectious pathogens (43.6%), perception of a burdensome reporting process (24.6%), and indifferent attitude towards being infected (16.9%). Nurses who worked over 8 hours per day had higher risks of exposure (OR 1.199, 95% CI 1.130 to 1.272, P < 0.001, respectively). The occupational exposure risk from providing 1-2 types of PPE is 1.947 times that of providing 9-10 types of PPE (OR 1.947, 95% CI 1.740 to 2.178, P < 0.001). Likewise, the occupational exposure risk of providing 1-2 types of safety-engineered injection devices is 1.275 times of that of providing 5-6 types (OR 1.275, 95% CI 1.179 to 1.379, P < 0.001).

conclusionsOccupational exposure to blood and body fluids in registered nurses is common, but the rate of under-reporting such exposure is high. Implementing engineered "sharp" injury prevention devices, following exposure prevention procedures, giving sufficient education and training to healthcare personnel on exposure prevention and control, and developing exposure reporting policies are all steps that can both reduce exposure and increase its reporting.

Indexed as

Bloodborne pathogensCross-sectional studyNeedlestickNursesOccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID36333812
PMCPMC9636689
OpenAlexW4308339820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.