Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333803›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

The reimbursement for expensive medicines: stakeholder perspectives on the SMA medicine nusinersen and the Dutch Coverage Lock policy.

Féline E V Scheijmans, Margot L Zomers, Sina Fadaei, Marthe R Onrust, Rieke van der Graaf, Johannes J M van Delden, W Ludo van der Pol, Ghislaine J M W van Thiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Féline E V ScheijmansDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.e.v.scheijmans@umcutrecht.nl.
Margot L ZomersUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sina FadaeiUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marthe R OnrustUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rieke van der GraafUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johannes J M van DeldenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W Ludo van der PolDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ghislaine J M W van ThielUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 854011007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reimbursement for expensive medicines poses a growing challenge to healthcare worldwide. In order to increase its control over the costs of medicines, the Dutch government introduced the Coverage Lock (CL) policy in 2015. The CL postpones decisions regarding reimbursement of expensive medicines until detailed advice on i.e., cost-effectiveness has been given. The CL has been in place for six years, has raised many questions and concerns, but currently, no evaluation is known to the authors. A better understanding of the effects of the CL on all stakeholders involved may contribute to reflections on the CL process and help find ways to improve it. An evaluation of Dutch policy will also be relevant for other countries that aim to optimize reimbursement procedures for expensive treatments. To perform this evaluation, we focused on the CL procedure for the medicine nusinersen. Nusinersen is the first treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Following EMA approval in May 2017, it was placed in the CL. The analysis of cost-effectiveness and added therapeutic value resulted in an advice for reimbursement limited to children younger than 9.5 years at the start of treatment; this was implemented from August 2018 onwards.

methodsQualitative stakeholder perspective analysis of the CL procedure focusing on nusinersen with 15 stakeholders.

resultsStakeholders raised key issues of the CL based on their experience with nusinersen: emotional impact of the CL, duration of the CL procedure, appropriateness of the CL procedure for different types of medicines, transparency of the CL, a wish for patient-centred decision-making and the lack of uniformity of access to expensive treatments. DISCUSSION: Stakeholders supported measures to control healthcare expenses and to ensure reasonable pricing. They considered the delay in access to therapies and lack of procedural transparency to be the main challenges to the CL. Stakeholders also agreed that the interests of patients deserve more attention in the practical implementation of the reimbursement decision. Stakeholders suggested a number of adjustments to improve the CL, such as a faster start with conditional reimbursement programs to ensure access and intensify European collaboration to speed up the assessment of the medicine.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalOligonucleotidesChildCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansPolicynusinersenOligonucleotidesExpensive medicinesHealthcare policyRare diseaseReimbursement policyThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID36333803
PMCPMC9636634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.