Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333737›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2022

Loss of Brca1 and Trp53 in adult mouse mammary ductal epithelium results in development of hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-negative tumors, depending on inactivation of Rb family proteins.

Ludmila Szabova, Melanie B Gordon, Lucy Lu, Nathan Pate, Laura Bassel, Anthony J Iacovelli, Baktiar Karim, Philip J Homan, Deborah B Householder, Theresa M Guerin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ludmila SzabovaCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA. lszabova@mail.nih.gov.
Melanie B GordonCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Lucy LuCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Nathan PateCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Laura BasselCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Anthony J IacovelliCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Baktiar KarimCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Philip J HomanCCR Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Deborah B HouseholderCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Theresa M GuerinCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Sandra BurkettMolecular Cytogenetics Core Facility, Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Amanda M DayCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Wendi CusterCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Zoe Weaver OhlerCenter for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA. zweaverohler@mail.nih.gov.
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a heterogenous disease with several histological and molecular subtypes. Models that represent these subtypes are essential for translational research aimed at improving clinical strategy for targeted therapeutics.

methodsDifferent combinations of genetic aberrations (Brca1 and Trp53 loss, and inhibition of proteins of the Rb family) were induced in the mammary gland by injection of adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase into the mammary ducts of adult genetically engineered mice. Mammary tumors with different genetic aberrations were classified into molecular subtypes based on expression of molecular markers and RNAseq analysis. In vitro potency assays and Western blots were used to examine their drug sensitivities.

resultsInduction of Brca1 and Trp53 loss in mammary ductal epithelium resulted in development of basal-like hormone receptor (HR)-negative mammary tumors. Inhibition of Rb and Trp53 loss or the combination of Rb, Trp53 and Brca1 aberrations resulted in development of luminal ductal carcinoma positive for ER, PR, and Her2 expression. HR positivity in tumors with Rb, Trp53 and Brca1 aberrations indicated that functionality of the Rb pathway rather than Brca1 status affected HR status in these models. Mammary tumor gene expression profiles recapitulated human basal-like or luminal B breast cancer signatures, but HR-positive luminal cancer models were endocrine resistant and exhibited upregulation of PI3K signaling and sensitivity to this pathway inhibition. Furthermore, both tumor subtypes were resistant to CDK4/6 inhibition.

conclusionsExamination of molecular expression profiles and drug sensitivities of tumors indicate that these breast cancer models can be utilized as a translational platform for evaluation of targeted combinations to improve chemotherapeutic response in patients that no longer respond to hormone therapy or that are resistant to CDK4/6 inhibition.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammary Glands, HumanMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinEpitheliumFemaleHormonesHumansMicePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanHormonesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesBasal-likeBrca1Breast cancerEndocrine resistantLuminal BMouse modelRbTrp53

Identifiers

PMID36333737
PMCPMC9636824
OpenAlexW4308297371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.