Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333672›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

AutoScore-Ordinal: an interpretable machine learning framework for generating scoring models for ordinal outcomes.

Seyed Ehsan Saffari, Yilin Ning, Feng Xie, Bibhas Chakraborty, Victor Volovici, Roger Vaughan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Nan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A point-based cognitive impairment scoring system for southeast Asian adults.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  4. Developing and validating a prediction tool for cerebral amyloid angiopathy neuropathological severity.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seyed Ehsan Saffari *Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Yilin Ning *Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Feng XieCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Bibhas ChakrabortyCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Victor VoloviciDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roger VaughanCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngProgramme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Nan LiuCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. liu.nan@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk prediction models are useful tools in clinical decision-making which help with risk stratification and resource allocations and may lead to a better health care for patients. AutoScore is a machine learning-based automatic clinical score generator for binary outcomes. This study aims to expand the AutoScore framework to provide a tool for interpretable risk prediction for ordinal outcomes.

methodsThe AutoScore-Ordinal framework is generated using the same 6 modules of the original AutoScore algorithm including variable ranking, variable transformation, score derivation (from proportional odds models), model selection, score fine-tuning, and model evaluation. To illustrate the AutoScore-Ordinal performance, the method was conducted on electronic health records data from the emergency department at Singapore General Hospital over 2008 to 2017. The model was trained on 70% of the data, validated on 10% and tested on the remaining 20%.

resultsThis study included 445,989 inpatient cases, where the distribution of the ordinal outcome was 80.7% alive without 30-day readmission, 12.5% alive with 30-day readmission, and 6.8% died inpatient or by day 30 post discharge. Two point-based risk prediction models were developed using two sets of 8 predictor variables identified by the flexible variable selection procedure. The two models indicated reasonably good performance measured by mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.758 and 0.793) and generalized c-index (0.737 and 0.760), which were comparable to alternative models.

conclusionAutoScore-Ordinal provides an automated and easy-to-use framework for development and validation of risk prediction models for ordinal outcomes, which can systematically identify potential predictors from high-dimensional data.

Indexed as

AftercarePatient DischargeElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesClinical scoreElectronic health recordsInterpretable machine learningMedical decision makingOrdinal outcome

Identifiers

PMID36333672
PMCPMC9636613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.