Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333660›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022

Usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy: a propensity score-matched study of the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system and the modified Aldrete score.

Daisuke Yamaguchi, Tomohito Morisaki, Yasuhisa Sakata, Yumi Mizuta, Goshi Nagatsuma, Suma Inoue, Akane Shimakura, Amane Jubashi, Yuki Takeuchi, Kei Ikeda and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan. daisukehawks@gmail.com.
Tomohito MorisakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Yasuhisa SakataDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
Yumi MizutaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Goshi NagatsumaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Suma InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Akane ShimakuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Amane JubashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Yuki TakeuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Kei IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Yuichiro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Wataru YoshiokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Naoyuki HinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Keisuke ArioDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Seiji TsunadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Motohiro EsakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saga University, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JPUreshino Medical Center · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of discharge standards in outpatients undergoing sedative endoscopy by comparing the modified post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (MPADSS) and the modified Aldrete score.

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 376 outpatients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy under midazolam sedation; 181 outpatients were assessed regarding discharge after sedative endoscopy using the MPADSS (group M), and 195 patients were assessed by the modified Aldrete score (group A). The clinical characteristics, types of endoscopy, endoscopic outcomes, and anesthesia outcomes were evaluated between the two groups. We compared discharge score, recovery time, and adverse events using propensity-score matching.

resultsPropensity-score matching created 120 matched pairs. The proportion of patients who had a recovery time within 60 min after endoscopy was significantly higher in group A than that in group M (42.5% versus 25.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). The proportion of patients who required > 120 min of recovery time after endoscopy was significantly lower in group A than that in group M (0.0% versus 5.0%, respectively; P = 0.03). However, significantly more patients had drowsiness at discharge in group A compared with group M (19.1% versus 5.0%, respectively; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the adverse event rate within 24 h of discharge between the groups.

conclusionsPatients assessed by the modified Aldrete score were allowed to discharge earlier than those assessed by the MPADSS. However, a patient's level of consciousness should be assessed carefully, especially in patients who visit the hospital alone.

Indexed as

AnestheticsPropofolEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansHypnotics and SedativesOutpatientsPatient DischargeProcedural SedationPropensity ScoreAnestheticsHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAdverse eventsDischargeDischarge timeGastrointestinal endoscopyOutpatientsSedation

Identifiers

PMID36333660
PMCPMC9635164
OpenAlexW4308354314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.