ArticleBehavior research methods2023
Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accounting for item calibration error in computerized adaptive testing.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- HBMIRT: A SAS macro for estimating uni- and multidimensional 1- and 2-parameter item response models in small (and large!) samples.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Benefits of the Curious Behavior of Bayesian Hierarchical Item Response Theory Models-An in-Depth Investigation and Bias Correction.Applied psychological measurement · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hierarchical Bayesian modeling is beneficial when complex models with many parameters of the same type, such as item response theory (IRT) models, are to be estimated with sparse data. Recently, Koenig et al. (Applied Psychological Measurement, 44, 311-326, 2020) illustrated in an optimized hierarchical Bayesian two-parameter logistic model (OH2PL) how to avoid bias due to unintended shrinkage or degeneracies of the posterior, and how to benefit from this approach in small samples. The generalizability of their findings, however, is limited because they investigated only a single specification of the hyperprior structure. Consequently, in a comprehensive simulation study, we investigated the robustness of the performance of the novel OH2PL in several specifications of their hyperpriors under a broad range of data conditions. We show that the novel OH2PL in the half-Cauchy or Exponential configuration yields unbiased (in terms of bias) model parameter estimates in small samples of N = 50. Moreover, it outperforms (especially in terms of the RMSE of the item discrimination parameters) marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation and its nonhierarchical counterpart. This further corroborates the possibility that hierarchical Bayesian IRT models behave differently than general hierarchical Bayesian models. We discuss these results regarding the applicability of complex IRT models in small-scale situations typical in psychological research, and illustrate the extended applicability of the 2PL IRT model with an empirical example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.