ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2023
Artificial Nerve Containing Stem Cells, Vascularity and Scaffold; Review of Our Studies.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of filling structures within nerve guidance conduits in a rat sciatic nerve injury model.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Potentially commercializable nerve guidance conduits for peripheral nerve injury: Past, present, and future.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Multilevel neurium-mimetic individualized graft via additive manufacturing for efficient tissue repair.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To promote nerve regeneration within a conduit (tubulation), we have performed studies using a tube model based on four important concepts for tissue engineering: vascularity, growth factors, cells, and scaffolds. A nerve conduit containing a blood vascular pedicle (vessel-containing tube) accelerated axon regeneration and increased the axon regeneration distance; however, it did not increase the number or diameter of the axons that regenerated within the tube. A vessel-containing tube with bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) transplantation led to the increase in the number and diameter of regenerated axons. Intratubularly transplanted decellularized allogenic nerve basal lamellae (DABLs) worked as a frame to maintain the fibrin matrix structure containing neurochemical factors and to anchor the transplanted stem cells within the tube. For the clinical application of nerve conduits, they should exhibit capillary permeability, biodegradability, and flexibility. Nerbridge® (Toyobo Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) is a commercially available artificial nerve conduit. The outer cylinder is a polyglycolic acid (PGA) fiber mesh and possesses capillary permeability. We used the outer cylinder of Nerbridge as a nerve conduit. A 20-mm sciatic nerve deficit was bridged by the PGA mesh tube containing DABLs and BMSCs, and the resulting nerve regeneration was compared with that obtained through a 20-mm autologous nerve graft. A neve-regeneration rate of about 70%-80% was obtained in 20-mm-long autologous nerve autografts using the new conduits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.