Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333620›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2023

Not in their hands only: hospital hygiene, evidence and collective moral responsibility.

Saana Jukola, Mariacarla Gadebusch Bondio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saana JukolaInstitute for Medical Humanities, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. saana.jukola@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9740-309X
Mariacarla Gadebusch BondioInstitute for Medical Humanities, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-3059

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 282210851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) are a major threat to patient safety. This paper addresses the following question: given what is known about the causes of and possible interventions on HAIs, to whom or what should the moral responsibility for preventing these infections be attributed? First, we show how generating robust evidence on the effectiveness of preventive hygiene measures is a complex endeavour and review the existing evidence on the causes of HAIs. Second, we demonstrate that the existing literature on the ethical aspects of infection control has focused on responsibility at the individual-level. Thirdly, we argue that these accounts do not accommodate systemic factors relevant for HAI prevention. We show that the notion of collective responsibility is useful for making understandable how systemic factors, such as employment conditions in hospitals, are both causally and ethically relevant in infection control.

Indexed as

MoralsSocial ResponsibilityHospitalsHumansHygieneInfection ControlCollective responsibilityEvidenceHospital acquired infectionsMedical ethicsMoral responsibility

Identifiers

PMID36333620
PMCPMC9984325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.