ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Universal lymph node detection in T2 MRI using neural networks.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection: a review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Classification of Multi-Parametric Body MRI Series Using Deep Learning.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
- Detection of abdominopelvic lymph nodes in multi-parametric MRI.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Universal detection and segmentation of lymph nodes in multi-parametric MRI.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIdentification of lymph nodes (LNs) that are suspicious for metastasis in T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is critical for assessment of lymphadenopathy. Prior work on LN detection has been limited to specific anatomical regions of the body (pelvis, rectum). Therefore, an approach to universally detect both benign and metastatic nodes in T2 MRI studies of the body is highly desirable.
methodsWe developed a Computer Aided Detection (CAD) pipeline to universally identify LN in T2 MRI. First, we trained various neural networks for detecting LN: Faster RCNN with and without Hard Negative Example Mining (HNEM), FCOS, FoveaBox, VFNet, and Detection Transformer (DETR). Next, we show that VFNet with Adaptive Training Sample Selection (ATSS) outperformed Faster RCNN with HNEM. Finally, we ensembled models that surpassed a 45% mAP threshold.
resultsExperiments on 122 test studies revealed that VFNet achieved a 51.1% mAP and 78.7% recall at 4 false positives (FP) per volume, while the one-stage model ensemble achieved a mAP of 52.3% and sensitivity of 78.7% at 4FP. We found that VFNet and the one-stage model ensemble can be interchangeably used in the CAD pipeline.
conclusionOur CAD pipeline universally detected both benign and metastatic nodes in T2 MRI studies, resulting in a sensitivity improvement of [Formula: see text]14% over the current LN detection approaches (sensitivity of 78.7% at 4 FP vs. 64.6% at 5 FP per volume).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.