Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333593›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted MR Image Reconstruction Using Deep Neural Networks.

Fariha Aamir, Ibtisam Aslam, Madiha Arshad, Hammad Omer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Fariha AamirMedical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ibtisam AslamMedical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan. Ibtisam.aslam@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-6147
Madiha ArshadMedical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hammad OmerMedical Image Processing Research Group (MIPRG), Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-sampling in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) decreases the scan time that helps to reduce off-resonance effects, geometric distortions, and susceptibility artifacts; however, it leads to under-sampling artifacts. In this paper, diffusion-weighted MR image (DWI-MR) reconstruction using deep learning (DWI U-Net) is proposed to recover artifact-free DW images from variable density highly under-sampled k-space data. Additionally, different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, have been investigated to choose the best optimizers for DWI U-Net. The reconstruction results are compared with the conventional Compressed Sensing (CS) reconstruction. The quality of the recovered images is assessed using mean artifact power (AP), mean root mean square error (RMSE), mean structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The proposed method provides up to 61.1%, 60.0%, 30.4%, and 28.7% improvements in the mean AP value of the reconstructed images in our experiments with different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, respectively, as compared to the conventional CS at an acceleration factor of 6 (i.e., AF = 6). The results of DWI U-Net with the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers show 13.6%, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 8.74% improvements, respectively, in terms of mean SSIM with respect to the conventional CS at AF = 6. Also, the proposed technique shows 51.4%, 29.5%, 24.04%, and 18.0% improvements in terms of mean RMSE using the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers, respectively, with reference to the conventional CS at AF = 6. The results confirm that DWI U-Net performs better than the conventional CS reconstruction. Also, when comparing the different optimizers in DWI U-Net, RMSProp provides better results than the other optimizers.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerCompressed Sensing (CS)Deep learningDWIMRISingle-shot echo planar imaging (ss-EPI)U-Net

Identifiers

PMID36333593
PMCPMC9984585
OpenAlexW4308192210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.