ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Magnetic resonance imaging following the demonstration of a normal common bile duct on ultrasound in children with suspected choledocholithiasis: what is the benefit?
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric cholelithiasis: a comprehensive analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical treatment strategies.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of MRI in evaluating children with an in situ gallbladder and suspected choledocholithiasis following a negative or inconclusive US is unclear.
objectiveTo determine whether MRI benefits children with suspected choledocholithiasis and a normal common bile duct (CBD) without stones on US. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective 10-year review of paired US and MRI (within 10 days) in children 18 years or younger with suspected choledocholithiasis. With MRI as a reference standard, two reviewers independently evaluated the images for CBD diameter, choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis and pancreatic edema. Serum lipase was recorded. We calculated exact binomial confidence limits for test positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) using R library epiR.
resultsOf 87 patients (46 female, 41 male; mean age 14 years, standard deviation [SD] 4.6 years; mean interval between US and MRI 1.6 days, SD 1.8 days), 55% (48/87) had true-negative US, without CBD dilation/stones confirmed on MRI; 5% (4/87) had false-positive US showing CBD dilatation without stones, not confirmed on MRI; 33% (29/87) had true-positive US, with MRI confirming CBD dilatation; and 7% (6/87) had false-negative US, where MRI revealed CBD stones without dilatation (2 patients) and CBD dilatation with or without stones (4 patients). Patients with false-negative US had persistent or worsening symptoms, pancreatitis or SCD. The overall US false-negative rate was 17% (6/35). Normal-caliber CBD on US without stones had an NPV of 89% (48/54, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.96).
conclusionMRI adds little information in children with a sonographically normal CBD except in the setting of pancreatitis or worsening clinical symptoms. Further evaluation is warranted in children with elevated risk of stone disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.