ArticleNPJ precision oncology2022
Identification of novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers in salivary duct carcinoma via comprehensive molecular profiling.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in head and neck tumors: molecular pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Evolving Concepts in Salivary Duct Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- A Clinical and Pathological Analysis of Seven Cases of Salivary Gland Ductal Carcinoma.Cureus · 2026Article
- Metastatic and recurrent salivary gland carcinoma: clinical characteristics and comprehensive molecular profiling at a tertiary care center.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Genomic profiling and HER2-targeted therapy: a case series of Chinese salivary duct carcinoma patients and its clinical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Illuminating the FGFR fusion landscape in Chinese patients: unveiling novel molecular insights and clinical implications.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Deciphering the cellular tumor microenvironment landscape in salivary gland carcinomas using multiplexed imaging mass cytometry.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Salivary Gland Cancers in the Era of Molecular Analysis: The Role of Tissue and Liquid Biomarkers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Advances in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: current strategies and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Molecular landscape of salivary gland malignancies. What is already known?Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors at 19 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular targets and predictive biomarkers for prognosis in salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) have not been fully identified. We conducted comprehensive molecular profiling to discover novel biomarkers for SDC. A total of 67 SDC samples were examined with DNA sequencing of 464 genes and transcriptome analysis in combination with the clinicopathological characteristics of the individuals. Prognostic biomarkers associated with response to combined androgen blockade (CAB) treatment were explored using mRNA expression data from 27 cases. Oncogenic mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes or genes in the MAPK pathway were identified in 55 cases (82.1%). Alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway were identified in 38 cases (56.7%). Interestingly, patient prognosis could be predicted using mRNA expression profiles, but not genetic mutation profiles. The risk score generated from the expression data of a four-gene set that includes the ADAMTS1, DSC1, RNF39, and IGLL5 genes was a significant prognostic marker for overall survival in the cohort (HR = 5.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.73-13.1, p = 7.8 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.