Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Site-specific CRISPR-based mitochondrial DNA manipulation is limited by gRNA import.

Ludwig Schmiderer, David Yudovich, Leal Oburoglu, Martin Hjort, Jonas Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and USP16 localize to the mitochondrion and influence its function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Guidelines for mitochondrial RNA analysis.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Base editing of organellar DNA with programmable deaminases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ludwig SchmidererDivision of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden. ludwig.schmiderer@med.lu.se.
David YudovichDivision of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Leal OburogluDivision of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Martin HjortChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas LarssonDivision of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, 221 00, Lund, Sweden. jonas.larsson@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving CRISPR Cas9-based manipulation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been a long-standing goal and would be of great relevance for disease modeling and for clinical applications. In this project, we aimed to deliver Cas9 into the mitochondria of human cells and analyzed Cas9-induced mtDNA cleavage and measured the resulting mtDNA depletion with multiplexed qPCR. In initial experiments, we found that measuring subtle effects on mtDNA copy numbers is challenging because of high biological variability, and detected no significant Cas9-caused mtDNA degradation. To overcome the challenge of being able to detect Cas9 activity on mtDNA, we delivered cytosine base editor Cas9-BE3 to mitochondria and measured its effect (C →  T mutations) on mtDNA. Unlike regular Cas9-cutting, this leaves a permanent mark on mtDNA that can be detected with amplicon sequencing, even if the efficiency is low. We detected low levels of C → T mutations in cells that were exposed to mitochondrially targeted Cas9-BE3, but, surprisingly, these occurred regardless of whether a guide RNA (gRNA) specific to the targeted site, or non-targeting gRNA was used. This unspecific off-target activity shows that Cas9-BE3 can technically edit mtDNA, but also strongly indicates that gRNA import to mitochondria was not successful. Going forward mitochondria-targeted Cas9 base editors will be a useful tool for validating successful gRNA delivery to mitochondria without the ambiguity of approaches that rely on quantifying mtDNA copy numbers.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansMitochondriaDNA, MitochondrialRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID36333335
PMCPMC9636205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.