Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36332946›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Radiofrequency-assisted transection of the pancreas versus stapler in distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a multicentric randomised clinical trial (TRANSPAIRE).

Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez, Eva Pueyo-Périz, J M Álamo, Gonzalo Suarez Artacho, Miguel Ángel Gómez Bravo, Manuel Marcello, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Valentina Ferri, Riccardo Caruso and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04402346 nacompletednot on this map

Radiofrequency-assisted Transection of the Pancreas vs Stapler. A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPatricia Sanchez VelazquezRan2021 to 2025Enrolled112ConditionsPancreas, FistulaArmsRadiofrequency-assisted pancreas transection, Stapler assisted pancreas transection
NCT07687901 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Radiofrequency-Assisted Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (Attachable Coolingbis®)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital del MarRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsPancreatectomyArmsInternally-cooled bipolar radiofrequency device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Sánchez-VelázquezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain psanchezvelazquez@psmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-3920
Eva Pueyo-PérizDepartment of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
J M ÁlamoDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Gonzalo Suarez ArtachoDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Gómez BravoDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Manuel MarcelloDepartment of Surgery, Alcorcon Hospital Foundation, Alcorcon, Spain.
Emilio VicenteDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda QuijanoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Valentina FerriDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Riccardo CarusoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Dimitri DorcarattoLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Luis SabaterLiver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of General Surgery. Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pilarena González ChávezHospital Virgen de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain.
Jose NogueraHospital Juan Canalejo de La Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Ana Navarro GonzaloHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Juan Bellido-LuqueHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Clara Téllez-MarquesDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Benedetto IelpoDepartment of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-3208
Fernando BurdioDepartment of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital San Juan de la Cruz · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo date, no pancreatic stump closure technique has been shown to be superior to any other in distal pancreatectomy. Although several studies have shown a trend towards better results in transection using a radiofrequency device (radiofrequency-assisted transection (RFT)), no randomised trial for this purpose has been performed to date. Therefore, we designed a randomised clinical trial, with the hypothesis that this technique used in distal pancreatectomies is superior in reducing clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) than mechanical closures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TRANSPAIRE is a multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted in seven Spanish pancreatic centres that includes 112 patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy for any indication who will be randomly assigned to RFT or classic stapler transections (control group) in a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is the CR-POPF percentage. Sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected POPF in control group of 32%, expected POPF in RFT group of 10% and a clinically relevant difference of 22%. Secondary outcomes include postoperative results, complications, radiological evaluation of the pancreatic stump, metabolomic profile of postoperative peritoneal fluid, survival and quality of life. Follow-ups will be carried out in the external consultation at 1, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: TRANSPAIRE has been approved by the CEIM-PSMAR Ethics Committee. This project is being carried out in accordance with national and international guidelines, the basic principles of protection of human rights and dignity established in the Declaration of Helsinki (64th General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013), and in accordance with regulations in studies with biological samples, Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research will be followed. We have defined a dissemination strategy, whose main objective is the participation of stakeholders and the transfer of knowledge to support the exploitation of activities. REGISTRATION DETAILS: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04402346).

Indexed as

PancreatectomyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreasPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsClinical trialsHepatobiliary surgeryPancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36332946
PMCPMC9639090
OpenAlexW4308338336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.