ArticleBMJ global health2022
Improving access to medicines: lessons from 10 years of drug reforms in China, 2009-2020.
Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec for type 2 diabetes in China: A cost-utility and budget impact analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Innovative Drugs Approved in China After Registration Classification Reform: Current Status, Disparities, and Challenges.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Financial Heterogeneity During Early Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Reform: A Two-Year Hospital-Based Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Digital transformation, green finance, and pharmaceutical affordability in China: a health economics perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of China's drug regulatory reform on access to orphan drugs: a cross-sectional study of diseases listed in the rare disease catalog.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A study on the availability of national centralized drug procurement in regions with different levels of economic development: an investigation and analysis of 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impacts of national volume-based procurement policy on insulin price, volume and expenditure in China: a quasi-experimental study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- East Meets West: A Multisite Validity Study of the China Medical Professionalism Inventory.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Advancements and challenges of adherence to secondary prevention medications among patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: the healthcare quality improvement in China, 2007-2018.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Whether medicine supply is really meeting primary health care needs: a mixed-methods study in Shandong Province, China.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Drug supply and assurance: a cross-sectional study of drug shortage monitoring varieties in China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) exclusively for insulin: towards affordable access in China and beyond.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- A point prevalence survey and monitoring indicator research on the second batch of national key monitoring and rational use drugs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Medical resource utilization and the associated costs of asthma in China: a 1-year retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Access to anticancer medicines in public hospitals of Northwestern China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Impact of the national drug price negotiation policy on the utilization, cost, and accessibility of anticancer medicines in China: A controlled interrupted time series study.Journal of global health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
China initiated its healthcare reform in 2009 to provide accessible and affordable healthcare to all. We summarised China's drug reforms between 2009 and 2020 using the WHO framework. China has initiated comprehensive drug policies to address different issues, including: (1) issuing or amending major regulations with changes in institutional settings; (2) implementing the marketing authorisation holder system and bioequivalence assessment to improve the quality of drugs; (3) leveraging accelerated market approval and insurance listing to encourage needs-driven innovation and improve the access to new drugs; (4) introducing compulsory licensing to address major public health threats when needed; (5) scaling up the National Essential Medicine Policy and introducing pharmacoeconomic evaluation in National Reimbursable Drug List to promote rational use of medicine and evidence-based selection; (6) applying differentiated pricing strategies and scaling up zero mark-up policies to form a new financing mechanism; (7) adapting bulk procurement and placing strict regulations on the supply chain management to ensure supply and reduce the cost; (8) empowering pharmacists to improve the rational use of medicine; and (9) using procurement and supply chain digital platforms to inform decision and improve efficiency. China's drug reform has adopted a phased and systemic approach that mobilises multiple policy levers including governance, regulation and financing. Despite the progress, emerging challenges in implementation, coordination and capacity need to be addressed. Cross-cutting lessons from China's drug reforms include aligning the drug reform with the overall health reforms, adapting a systemic approach that mobilised policy levers and stakeholders and informing policy decision by conducting pilot studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.