ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2023
Comparison of in vivo visco-hyperelastic properties of uterine suspensory tissue in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Holistic Pelvic Floor: Pelvic Floor Stress Dysfunction Diseases.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Anterior Colporrhaphy and Paravaginal Repair for Anterior Compartment Prolapse: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Roles and mechanisms of biomechanical-biochemical coupling in pelvic organ prolapse.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The uterine suspensory tissue (UST) complex includes the cardinal (CL) and uterosacral "ligaments" (USL), which are mesentery-like structures that play a role in resisting pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Since there is no information on the time-dependent material properties of the whole structure in situ and in vivo, we developed and tested an intraoperative technique to quantify in vivo whether there is a significant difference in visco-hyperelastic behavior of the CL and USL between women with and without POP. Thirteen women with POP (cases) and four controls scheduled for surgery were selected from an ongoing POP study. Immediately prior to surgery, a computer-controlled linear servo-actuator with a series force transducer applied a continuous, caudally directed traction force while simultaneously recording the resulting cervical displacement in the same direction. After applying an initial 1.1 N preload, a ramp rate of 4 mm/s was used to apply a maximum force of 17.8 N in three "ramp-and-hold" test trials. A simplified bilateral four-cable biomechanical model was used to identify the material behavior of each ligament. For this, the initial cross-section areas of the CL and USL were measured on 3-T magnetic resonance image-based 3D models from each subject. The time-dependent strain energy function of CL/USL was defined with a three-parameter hyperelastic Mooney-Rivlin material model and a two-term Prony series in relaxation form. When cases were compared with controls, the estimated time-dependent material constants of CL and USL did not differ significantly. These are the first measurements that compare the in vivo and in situ visco-hyperelastic response of the tissues comprising the CL and USL to loading in women with and without prolapse. Larger sample sizes would help improve the precision of intergroup differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.