Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36332274›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2023

Examining a window of vulnerability for affective symptoms in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.

Darwin A Guevarra, Courtney C Louis, Lilianne M Gloe, Stefanie Russman Block, Deborah A Kashy, Kelly L Klump, Jason S Moser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Reproducible stability of verbal and spatial functions along the menstrual cycle.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Errors elicit frontoparietal theta-gamma coupling that is modulated by endogenous estradiol levels.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Darwin A GuevarraMichigan State University, United States; University of California, San Francisco, United States. Electronic address: Darwin.Guevarra@ucsf.edu.
Courtney C LouisMichigan State University, United States.
Lilianne M GloeMichigan State University, United States.
Stefanie Russman BlockUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States.
Deborah A KashyMichigan State University, United States.
Kelly L KlumpMichigan State University, United States.
Jason S MoserMichigan State University, United States.
Michigan State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Cognitive Control in Anxiety: The Role of Ovarian HormonesR01MH108511 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSER, JASON SCOT · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particular phases of the menstrual cycle may exacerbate affective symptoms for females with a diagnosed mental health disorder. However, there are mixed findings regarding whether affective symptoms change across the menstrual cycle in females without a clinical diagnosis. The window of vulnerability model proposes that natural increases in ovarian hormones in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle lead to systematic changes in brain networks associated with affective processing. Consequently, the model posits that females may experience stress more intensely and remember negative events more readily in the mid-luteal phase, increasing their risk for higher affective symptoms. Using a 35-day longitudinal study design, we tested the window of vulnerability model in a non-clinical sample. We tracked naturally cycling females' daily stress and three types of affective symptoms: anxious apprehension, anxious arousal, and anhedonic depression. Using multilevel modeling, we simultaneously modeled within- and between-person associations among stress and menstrual phase for each affective symptom. We found increased anhedonic depression in the mid-luteal phase but not anxious apprehension or anxious arousal. Moreover, we detected a positive association between within- and between-person stress and anxious apprehension and anhedonic depression, but not anxious arousal. These associations were not stronger in the mid-luteal phase. Overall, we provide weak evidence for a window of vulnerability for affective symptoms in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Our findings suggest that stress is a better predictor of fluctuations in affective symptoms than the menstrual cycle. Moreover, our findings highlight the importance of measuring multiple negative affective symptoms because they may be differentially related to stress and the menstrual cycle.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsLuteal PhaseEstradiolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMenstrual CycleProgesteroneEstradiolProgesteroneAnxietyDepressionEstradiolMenstrual cycleProgesteroneStress

Identifiers

PMID36332274
PMCPMC10348069
OpenAlexW4307000153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.