Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36332272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2022

Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies.

Namrata Prasad, Shavi Fernando, Sue Willey, Kym Davey, Jennifer Hocking, Atul Malhotra, Arunaz Kumar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Namrata PrasadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shavi FernandoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sue WilleyMonash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kym DaveyMonash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jennifer HockingSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Atul MalhotraDepartment of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Arunaz KumarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash University · AUAustralian Catholic University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes. Results: Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning). Conclusions: Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceMidwiferyStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceEmergenciesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterprofessional RelationsPregnancyinterprofessional educationlearning through modellingobstetriconline learningsimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID36332272
PMCPMC9911278
OpenAlexW4308330870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.