ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation of Interstrand DNA Cross-Links under Conditions of Acid Stress.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Glutathionylated DNA adducts accumulate in mitochondrial DNA and are regulated by AP endonuclease 1 and tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Dirty Ends: Formation, Repair, and Biological Relevance of Non-Canonical DNA Terminal Structures.Genes · 2025Review
- Proteome-Wide Identification ofAnalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- ERCC4: a potential regulatory factor in inflammatory bowel disease and inflammation-associated colorectal cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- DNA-protein cross-links between abasic DNA damage and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM).Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites, that is, abasic sites, are among the most frequently induced DNA lesions. Spontaneous or DNA glycosylase-mediated β-elimination of the 3'-phosphoryl group can lead to strand cleavages at AP sites to yield a highly reactive, electrophilic 3'-phospho-α,β-unsaturated aldehyde (3'-PUA) remnant. The latter can react with amine or thiol groups of biological small molecules, DNA, and proteins to yield various damaged 3'-end products. Considering its high intracellular concentration, glutathione (GSH) may conjugate with 3'-PUA to yield 3-glutathionyl-2,3-dideoxyribose (GS-ddR), which may constitute a significant, yet previously unrecognized endogenous lesion. Here, we developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy method, in combination with the use of a stable isotope-labeled internal standard, to quantify GS-ddR in genomic DNA of cultured human cells. Our results revealed the presence of GS-ddR in the DNA of untreated cells, and its level was augmented in cells upon exposure to an alkylating agent,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.