Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis in France using prenatal screening: A decision-analytic economic model.

Larry Sawers, Martine Wallon, Laurent Mandelbrot, Isabelle Villena, Eileen Stillwaggon, François Kieffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. TORCH agents in women of fertile age: towards prevention of congenital infections, Italy, 2019 to 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Larry SawersDepartment of Economics, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-3079
Martine WallonDepartment of Parasitology and Medical Mycology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Laurent MandelbrotObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Colombes, France.
Isabelle VillenaDepartment of Parasitology and Medical Mycology, National Reference Centre on Toxoplasmosis, Hôpital Reims, Reims, France.
Eileen StillwaggonNational School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
François KiefferDepartment of Neonatology, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5499-9479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasma gondii is one of the world's most common parasites. Primary infection of the mother during pregnancy can lead to transmission to the fetus with risks of brain and eye lesions, which may cause lifelong disabilities. France instituted a national program based on monthly retesting of susceptible pregnant women to reduce the number of severe cases through prompt antenatal and postnatal treatment and follow-up.

objectiveTo evaluate the ability of the French prenatal retesting program to reduce the lifetime costs of congenital toxoplasmosis.

methodsWe measured and then compared the costs and benefits of screening vs. not screening using decision-tree modelling. It included direct and indirect costs to society of treatment and care, and the lifetime lost earnings of children and caregivers. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out.

findingsTotal lifetime costs per live born child identified as congenitally infected were estimated to be €444 for those identified through prenatal screening vs €656 for those who were not screened. Estimates were robust to changes in all costs of diagnosis, treatment, and sequelae.

interpretationScreening for the prevention of the congenital T. gondii infection in France is cost saving at €212 per birth. Compared with no screening, screening every pregnant woman in France for toxoplasmosis in 2020 would have saved the country €148 million in addition to reducing or eliminating the devastating physical and emotional suffering caused by T. gondii. Our findings reinforce the conclusions of other decision-analytic modelling of prenatal toxoplasmosis screening.

Indexed as

Fetal DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisToxoplasmosis, CongenitalChildFemaleFranceHumansModels, EconomicPregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36331943
PMCPMC9635746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.