Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331935›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Higher readability of institutional websites drives the correct fruition of the abortion pathway: A cross-sectional study.

Amerigo Ferrari, Luca Pirrotta, Manila Bonciani, Giulia Venturi, Milena Vainieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amerigo FerrariInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-2813
Luca PirrottaInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy.
Manila BoncianiInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy.
Giulia VenturiInstitute of Computational Linguistics "A. Zampolli" (ILC-CNR), Italian Natural Language Processing Laboratory (ItaliaNLP Lab), National Research Council, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy.
Milena VainieriInstitute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Italy, abortion services are public: therefore, health Institutions should provide clear and easily readable web-based information. We aimed to 1) assess variation in abortion services utilisation; 2) analyse the readability of institutional websites informing on induced abortion; 3) explore whether easier-to-read institutional websites influenced the correct fruition of abortion services.

methodsWe identified from the 2021 administrative databases of Tuscany all women having an abortion, and-among them-women having an abortion with the certification provided by family counselling centres, following the pathway established by law. We assessed variation in total and certified abortion rates by computing the Systematic Component of Variation. We analysed the readability of the Tuscan health authorities' websites using the readability assessment tool READ-IT. We explored how institutional website readability influenced the odds of having certified abortions by running multilevel logistic models, considering health authorities as the highest-level variables.

resultsWe observed high variation in the correct utilization of the abortion pathway in terms of certified abortion rates. The READ-IT scores showed that the most readable text was from the Florence Teaching Hospital website. Multilevel models revealed that higher READ-IT scores, corresponding to more difficult texts, resulted in lower odds of certified abortions.

conclusionsLarge variation in the proper fruition of abortion pathways occurs in Tuscany, and such variation may depend on readability of institutional websites informing on induced abortion. Therefore, health Institutions should monitor and improve the readability of their websites to ensure proper and more equitable access to abortion.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedConsumer Health InformationAcademic Medical CentersComprehensionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetPregnancyReading

Identifiers

PMID36331935
PMCPMC9635703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.