Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331878›Full record

ArticleRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc2023

New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Julia E Goldberg, Beatriu Reig, Alana A Lewin, Yiming Gao, Laura Heacock, Samantha L Heller, Linda Moy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Evolution of tomosynthesis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Invited Commentary: The Power and Promise of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia E GoldbergFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-2137
Beatriu ReigFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-6577-8601
Alana A LewinFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.
Yiming GaoFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-2311-7442
Laura HeacockFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.
Samantha L HellerFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-2950
Linda MoyFrom the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-9360
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening has become widely accepted, facilitating increased cancer detection and lower recall rates compared with those achieved by using full-field digital mammography (DM). However, the use of DBT, as compared with DM, raises new challenges, including a larger number of acquired images and thus longer interpretation times. While most current artificial intelligence (AI) applications are developed for DM, there are multiple potential opportunities for AI to augment the benefits of DBT. During the diagnostic steps of lesion detection, characterization, and classification, AI algorithms may not only assist in the detection of indeterminate or suspicious findings but also aid in predicting the likelihood of malignancy for a particular lesion. During image acquisition and processing, AI algorithms may help reduce radiation dose and improve lesion conspicuity on synthetic two-dimensional DM images. The use of AI algorithms may also improve workflow efficiency and decrease the radiologist's interpretation time. There has been significant growth in research that applies AI to DBT, with several algorithms approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical implementation. Further development of AI models for DBT has the potential to lead to improved practice efficiency and ultimately improved patient health outcomes of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluation. See the invited commentary by Bahl in this issue.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBreastEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammography

Identifiers

PMID36331878
OpenAlexW4308222788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.