ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Robotic pullback technique of a precurved cochlear-implant electrode array using real-time impedance sensing feedback.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micro-CT Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Insertion of CI632 Implant in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Cochlear Implantation: Electrode Impedance in Users With Triphasic Pulse Pattern.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Transimpedance Matrix Measurement (TIM) Parameters Evaluation for the Assessment of Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Modiolar Proximity in Children.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDuring traditional insertion of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays (EAs), surgeons rely on limited tactile feedback and visualization of the EA entering the cochlea to control the insertion. One insertion approach for precurved EAs involves slightly overinserting the EA and then retracting it slightly to achieve closer hugging of the modiolus. In this work, we investigate whether electrical impedance sensing could be a valuable real-time feedback tool to advise this pullback technique.
methodsUsing a to-scale 3D-printed scala tympani model, a robotic insertion tool, and a custom impedance sensing system, we performed experiments to assess the bipolar insertion impedance profiles for a cochlear CI532/632 precurved EA. Four pairs of contacts from the 22 electrode contacts were chosen based on preliminary testing and monitored in real time to halt the robotic insertion once the closest modiolar position had been achieved but prior to when the angular insertion depth (AID) would be reduced.
resultsIn this setting, the open-loop robotic insertion impedance profiles were very consistent between trials. The exit of each contact from the external stylet of this EA was clearly discernible on the impedance profile. In closed-loop experiments using the pullback technique, the average distance from the electrode contacts to the modiolus was reduced without greatly affecting the AID by using impedance feedback in real time to determine when to stop EA retraction.
conclusionImpedance sensing, and specifically the access resistance component of impedance, could be a valuable real-time feedback tool in the operating room during CI EA insertion. Future work should more thoroughly analyze the effects of more realistic operating room conditions and inter-patient variability on this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.