Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331754›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2023

Recurrence Rates and Pharmacological Treatment for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Systematic Review.

Varut Lohsiriwat, Parvez Sheikh, Robert Bandolon, Dong-Lin Ren, April Camilla Roslani, Kassandra Schaible, Andreas Freitag, Monique Martin, Pelin Yaltirik, Philippe Godeberge

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Varut LohsiriwatDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. bolloon@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2252-9509
Parvez SheikhDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2153-2930
Robert BandolonSouthern Philippines Medical Center, Davao, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-9864
Dong-Lin RenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital (Gastrointestinal and Anal Hospital), Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5599-8654
April Camilla RoslaniDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2458-965X
Kassandra SchaibleEvidera, Waltham, MA, USA.
Andreas FreitagEvidera, London, UK.
Monique MartinEvidera, London, UK.
Pelin YaltirikInternal Medicine and Neuropsychiatry, Global Medical and Patient Affairs (GMPA), Servier, Suresnes, France.
Philippe GodebergeUnité d'endoscopie et de proctologie, Clinique du Trocadéro, Paris, France.
EVRAZ (United Kingdom) · GBClinique Ambroise Paré · FRIthaka Harbors · USSaifee Hospital · INServier (France) · FRSiriraj Hospital · THSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHemorrhoidal disease (HD) is characterized by prolapse of the inflamed and bleeding vascular tissues of the anal canal. Although HD is associated with a high recurrence rate, there is a lack of understanding around interventions that can reduce recurrence and improve outcomes for patients. As such, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to summarize evidence on epidemiology, recurrence, and efficacy of interventions in HD.

methodsReal-world evidence (RWE) studies evaluating the incidence, prevalence, or recurrence of HD, as well as SLRs including a meta-analytic component reporting on the efficacy of systemic or topical pharmacological treatments for adults with HD, were included. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

resultsThe SLR identified 44 eligible publications. Consistent data were limited on the epidemiology of HD or HD recurrence. Specifically, incidence and prevalence reported across geographies were impacted by differences in data collection. Reported risk factors for HD were sedentary behavior, constipation, male gender, and age. Twenty-three RWE studies and one meta-analysis reported HD recurrence rates ranging from 0 to 56.5% following surgery or phlebotonics, with most (n = 19) reporting rates of 20% or less. In addition to time since treatment, risk factors for recurring disease were similar to those for HD in general. With respect to treatment, micronized purified flavonoid fractions significantly improved the main symptoms of HD compared to other pharmacological treatments.

conclusionThe SLRs did not identify any RWE studies reporting recurrence in patients receiving systemic or topical treatments, highlighting the need for future research in this area. Further, more studies are needed to understand the optimum duration of medical treatment to prevent recurrence.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidsAdultFlavonoidsHemorrhageHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicRisk FactorsFlavonoidsHemorrhoidsMPFFPhlebotonicsRecurrenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36331754
PMCPMC9859842
OpenAlexW4308182012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.