Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331714›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2022

Kin or Research Material? Exploring IVF Couples' Perceptions about the Human Embryo and Implications for Disposition Decisions in Norway.

B Kvernflaten, P Fedorcsák, K N Solbrække

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B KvernflatenDepartment for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3a, 0373, Oslo, Norway. birgit.kvernflaten@medisin.uio.no.
P FedorcsákDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, 0372, Norway.
K N SolbrækkeDepartment for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3a, 0373, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) involves making embryos outside of the human body, which has spurred debate about the status of the embryo, embryo research and donation. We explore couples' perceptions about embryos and their thoughts and acceptability about various disposition decisions in Norway. Based on an ethnographic study including interviews and observations in an IVF clinic, we show that couples do not perceive their pre-implantation IVF embryos to be human lives; rather, they consider successful implantation the start of life. We suggest that this response indicates a change in the perception of the human embryo or the fertilised egg from incipient life-a viewpoint that was dominant in the discussions of embryo research in the 1980s and 1990s. We also show how this view of the pre-implantation embryo elucidates why donating embryos to research appears acceptable but donating to other infertile couples seems rather difficult. Before transfer to a woman's uterus, the embryo exists in a liminality; it is not yet human life but a living cell with potential for both research and pregnancy. When an embryo is implanted and pregnancy is confirmed, human life activates; the embryo becomes potential kin, influencing couples' struggles with donating embryos to other couples.

Indexed as

Embryo DispositionEmbryo ResearchEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansNorwayPregnancyEmbryo donationEmbryo researchIVFKinshipLiminalityReproductive technologies

Identifiers

PMID36331714
PMCPMC9908683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.