Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331569›Full record

ReviewHerz2022

[Mechanical circulatory support systems : When and how much protection does a PCI need?]

C Liebetrau, H Eggebrecht, A Schmermund

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C LiebetrauMVZ CCB am Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus, Im Prüfling 23, 60389, Frankfurt a. M., Deutschland. c.liebetrau@ccb.de.
H EggebrechtMVZ CCB am Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus, Im Prüfling 23, 60389, Frankfurt a. M., Deutschland.
A SchmermundMVZ CCB am Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus, Im Prüfling 23, 60389, Frankfurt a. M., Deutschland.
Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interventional treatment of high-risk patients remains challenging and has a high potential for improvement despite all technical innovations. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems can be meaningful depending on the clinical situation, although a clear study situation for this is so far lacking. Multivessel coronary disease and a high SYNTAX score combined with impaired ventricular function is a possible predictor combination for the use of MCS that justifies the higher risk of complications.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart-Assist DevicesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingShock, CardiogenicExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationIntra-aortic balloon pumpMultivessel coronary diseasePercutaneous left ventricular assist devicesSYNTAX score

Identifiers

PMID36331569
OpenAlexW4308179091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.