ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022
Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators of Ambient Assisted Living Systems: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Ambient intelligence-based framework for quantitative evaluation of cell culture operations to support standardization and training.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Optimizing document retrieval using massive text embeddings and LLM prompt engineering.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- IoTMindCare: An Integrative Reference Architecture for Safe and Personalized IoT-Based Depression Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence tool development: what clinicians need to know?BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Huggable integrated socially assistive robots: exploring the potential and challenges for sustainable use in long-term care contexts.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Social Robots and Sensors for Enhanced Aging at Home: Mixed Methods Study With a Focus on Mobility and Socioeconomic Factors.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- Application of Digital Informatics in Precision Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinicogenomics Research to Advance Precision Healthcare.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Mobile and wearable technologies for the analysis of Ten Meter Walk Test: A concise systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Exploring the Role of Active Assisted Living in the Continuum of Care for Older Adults: Thematic Analysis.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Decade Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbient assisted living (AAL) is a common name for various artificial intelligence (AI)-infused applications and platforms that support their users in need in multiple activities, from health to daily living. These systems use different approaches to learn about their users and make automated decisions, known as AI models, for personalizing their services and increasing outcomes. Given the numerous systems developed and deployed for people with different needs, health conditions, and dispositions toward the technology, it is critical to obtain clear and comprehensive insights concerning AI models used, along with their domains, technology, and concerns, to identify promising directions for future work.
objectiveThis study aimed to provide a scoping review of the literature on AI models in AAL. In particular, we analyzed specific AI models used in AАL systems, the target domains of the models, the technology using the models, and the major concerns from the end-user perspective. Our goal was to consolidate research on this topic and inform end users, health care professionals and providers, researchers, and practitioners in developing, deploying, and evaluating future intelligent AAL systems.
methodsThis study was conducted as a scoping review to identify, analyze, and extract the relevant literature. It used a natural language processing toolkit to retrieve the article corpus for an efficient and comprehensive automated literature search. Relevant articles were then extracted from the corpus and analyzed manually. This review included 5 digital libraries: IEEE, PubMed, Springer, Elsevier, and MDPI.
resultsWe included a total of 108 articles. The annual distribution of relevant articles showed a growing trend for all categories from January 2010 to July 2022. The AI models mainly used unsupervised and semisupervised approaches. The leading models are deep learning, natural language processing, instance-based learning, and clustering. Activity assistance and recognition were the most common target domains of the models. Ambient sensing, mobile technology, and robotic devices mainly implemented the models. Older adults were the primary beneficiaries, followed by patients and frail persons of various ages. Availability was a top beneficiary concern.
conclusionsThis study presents the analytical evidence of AI models in AAL and their domains, technologies, beneficiaries, and concerns. Future research on intelligent AAL should involve health care professionals and caregivers as designers and users, comply with health-related regulations, improve transparency and privacy, integrate with health care technological infrastructure, explain their decisions to the users, and establish evaluation metrics and design guidelines.
trial registrationPROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022347590; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022347590.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.