Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331396›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

If it ain't broke, don't fix it: evaluating the effect of increased recombination on response to selection for wheat breeding.

Ella Taagen, Katherine Jordan, Eduard Akhunov, Mark E Sorrells, Jean-Luc Jannink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Partial cytological diploidization of neoautotetraploid meiosis by induced cross-over rate reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Exploring impact of recombination landscapes on breeding outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ella TaagenPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8086-2775
Katherine JordanUSDA-ARS, Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1323-6824
Eduard AkhunovDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-5211
Mark E SorrellsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA.
Jean-Luc JanninkPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-628X
Cornell University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is a source of allelic diversity, but the low frequency and biased distribution of crossovers that occur during meiosis limits the genetic variation available to plant breeders. Simulation studies previously identified that increased recombination frequency can retain more genetic variation and drive greater genetic gains than wildtype recombination. Our study was motivated by the need to define desirable recombination intervals in regions of the genome with fewer crossovers. We hypothesized that deleterious variants, which can negatively impact phenotypes and occur at higher frequencies in low recombining regions where they are linked in repulsion with favorable loci, may offer a signal for positioning shifts of recombination distributions. Genomic selection breeding simulation models based on empirical wheat data were developed to evaluate increased recombination frequency and changing recombination distribution on response to selection. Comparing high and low values for a range of simulation parameters identified that few combinations retained greater genetic variation and fewer still achieved higher genetic gain than wildtype. More recombination was associated with loss of genomic prediction accuracy, which outweighed the benefits of disrupting repulsion linkages. Irrespective of recombination frequency or distribution and deleterious variant annotation, enhanced response to selection under increased recombination required polygenic trait architecture, high heritability, an initial scenario of more repulsion than coupling linkages, and greater than 6 cycles of genomic selection. Altogether, the outcomes of this research discourage a controlled recombination approach to genomic selection in wheat as a more efficient path to retaining genetic variation and increasing genetic gains compared with existing breeding methods.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticumAllelesGenetic LinkageSelection, GeneticSelective Breedingdeleterious variantgenomic selectionmeiotic recombinationsimulationwheat

Identifiers

PMID36331396
PMCPMC9713416
OpenAlexW4308184985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.