ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022
If it ain't broke, don't fix it: evaluating the effect of increased recombination on response to selection for wheat breeding.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The meiotic achilles' heel: vulnerability and resilience under environmental stress.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Prioritization of deleterious mutations informs genomic prediction and increases the rate of gain in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a simulation study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Optimum recombination rates for genetic gains in simulated recurrent selection in empirical maize populations.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Simulating the impact of recombination rate on genomic selection breeding outcomes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- The effect of haplotype size on genomic selection accuracy and epistasis: An empirical study in rice.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Mixed Outcomes in Recombination Rates After Domestication: Revisiting Theory and Data.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Enhancing local meiotic crossovers in Arabidopsis and maize through juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Genetic mapping and haplotype analysis identify novel candidate genes for high night temperature tolerance in winter wheat.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Recombination and structural variation in a large 8-founder wheat MAGIC population.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Potential approaches to create ultimate genotypes in crops and livestock.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Partial cytological diploidization of neoautotetraploid meiosis by induced cross-over rate reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Exploring impact of recombination landscapes on breeding outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is a source of allelic diversity, but the low frequency and biased distribution of crossovers that occur during meiosis limits the genetic variation available to plant breeders. Simulation studies previously identified that increased recombination frequency can retain more genetic variation and drive greater genetic gains than wildtype recombination. Our study was motivated by the need to define desirable recombination intervals in regions of the genome with fewer crossovers. We hypothesized that deleterious variants, which can negatively impact phenotypes and occur at higher frequencies in low recombining regions where they are linked in repulsion with favorable loci, may offer a signal for positioning shifts of recombination distributions. Genomic selection breeding simulation models based on empirical wheat data were developed to evaluate increased recombination frequency and changing recombination distribution on response to selection. Comparing high and low values for a range of simulation parameters identified that few combinations retained greater genetic variation and fewer still achieved higher genetic gain than wildtype. More recombination was associated with loss of genomic prediction accuracy, which outweighed the benefits of disrupting repulsion linkages. Irrespective of recombination frequency or distribution and deleterious variant annotation, enhanced response to selection under increased recombination required polygenic trait architecture, high heritability, an initial scenario of more repulsion than coupling linkages, and greater than 6 cycles of genomic selection. Altogether, the outcomes of this research discourage a controlled recombination approach to genomic selection in wheat as a more efficient path to retaining genetic variation and increasing genetic gains compared with existing breeding methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.