Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331281›Full record

ArticleBrainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)2022

Optimization of Deep Learning Based Brain Extraction in MRI for Low Resource Environments.

Siddhesh P Thakur, Sarthak Pati, Ravi Panchumarthy, Deepthi Karkada, Junwen Wu, Dmitry Kurtaev, Chiharu Sako, Prashant Shah, Spyridon Bakas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Deep Learning Aided Neuroimaging and Brain Regulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siddhesh P ThakurCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4807-2495
Sarthak PatiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-8487
Ravi PanchumarthyIntel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5417-6605
Deepthi KarkadaIntel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0623-548X
Junwen WuIntel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-4722
Dmitry KurtaevIntel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8822-8741
Chiharu SakoCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-3954
Prashant ShahIntel Health and Life Sciences, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-574X
Spyridon BakasCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-6482

Funding

Statistical atlases of brain tumor MRI:do imaging phenotypes predict progression?R01NS042645 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2002 to 2024
$8.7M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) platform: An intuitive tool facilitating secure multi-institutional collaborationU01CA242871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAKAS, SPYRIDON · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA242871NIH HHS S10 OD023495NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain extraction is an indispensable step in neuro-imaging with a direct impact on downstream analyses. Most such methods have been developed for non-pathologically affected brains, and hence tend to suffer in performance when applied on brains with pathologies, e.g., gliomas, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injuries. Deep Learning (DL) methodologies for healthcare have shown promising results, but their clinical translation has been limited, primarily due to these methods suffering from i) high computational cost, and ii) specific hardware requirements, e.g., DL acceleration cards. In this study, we explore the potential of mathematical optimizations, towards making DL methods amenable to application in low resource environments. We focus on both the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of such optimizations on an existing DL brain extraction method, designed for pathologically-affected brains and agnostic to the input modality. We conduct direct optimizations and quantization of the trained model (i.e., prior to inference on new data). Our results yield substantial gains, in terms of speedup, latency, through-put, and reduction in memory usage, while the segmentation performance of the initial and the optimized models remains stable, i.e., as quantified by both the Dice Similarity Coefficient and the Hausdorff Distance. These findings support post-training optimizations as a promising approach for enabling the execution of advanced DL methodologies on plain commercial-grade CPUs, and hence contributing to their translation in limited- and low- resource clinical environments.

Indexed as

Brain extractionBrainMaGeBrain tumorBraTSCNNConvolutional neural networkDeep learningGaNDLFGlioblastomaGliomaLow resource environmentOpenVINOSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36331281
PMCPMC9627678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.