ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2022
A Penalty Approach for Normalizing Feature Distributions to Build Confounder-Free Models.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confounder-Free Continual Learning via Recursive Feature Normalization.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025Article
- Addressing fairness issues in deep learning-based medical image analysis: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Subject Harmonization of Digital Biomarkers: Improved Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Language Markers.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024Article
- Temporal Harmonization: Improved Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Temporal Language Markers using Subject-invariant Learning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Translating the use of modern machine learning algorithms into clinical applications requires settling challenges related to explain-ability and management of nuanced confounding factors. To suitably interpret the results, removing or explaining the effect of confounding variables (or metadata) is essential. Confounding variables affect the relationship between input training data and target outputs. Accordingly, when we train a model on such data, confounding variables will bias the distribution of the learned features. A recent promising solution, Meta-Data Normalization (MDN), estimates the linear relationship between the metadata and each feature based on a non-trainable closed-form solution. However, this estimation is confined by the sample size of a mini-batch and thereby may result in an oscillating performance. In this paper, we extend the MDN method by applying a Penalty approach (referred to as PDMN). We cast the problem into a bi-level nested optimization problem. We then approximate that objective using a penalty method so that the linear parameters within the MDN layer are trainable and learned on all samples. This enables PMDN to be plugged into any architectures, even those unfit to run batch-level operations such as transformers and recurrent models. We show improvement in model accuracy and independence from the confounders using PMDN over MDN in a synthetic experiment and a multi-label, multi-site classification of magnetic resonance images.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.