Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36331278›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2022

A Penalty Approach for Normalizing Feature Distributions to Build Confounder-Free Models.

Anthony Vento, Qingyu Zhao, Robert Paul, Kilian Pohl, Ehsan Adeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Confounder-Free Continual Learning via Recursive Feature Normalization.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony VentoStanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA.
Qingyu ZhaoStanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-0889
Robert PaulMissouri Institute of Mental Health, St. Louis MO 63121, USA.
Kilian PohlStanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5416-5159
Ehsan AdeliStanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0579-7763

Funding

TRACKING HIV INFECTION AND ALCOHOL ABUSE CNS COMORBIDITY WITH NEUROIMAGINGU01AA017347 · NIAAA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI PFEFFERBAUM, ADOLF, SULLIVAN, EDITH VIONI · 2007 to 2021
$16.0M
Machine learning to distinguish HAND from Alzheimer's disease in HIV over age 60R01MH113406 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POHL, KILIAN MARIA, VALCOUR, VICTOR · 2017 to 2021
$5.5M
Tracking HIV Infection & Alcohol Abuse CNS Comorbidity with NeuroimagingR01AA017347 · NIAAA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI Adolf Pfefferbaum · 2022 to 2026
$5.2M
Interpretable Deep Forecasting of Hazardous Substance Use during High SchoolR01DA057567 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kilian Maria Pohl, Susan F. Tapert · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in HIV and CognitionK24MH098759 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VALCOUR, VICTOR · 2013 to 2017
$887k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017347NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA017347NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057567NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH098759NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translating the use of modern machine learning algorithms into clinical applications requires settling challenges related to explain-ability and management of nuanced confounding factors. To suitably interpret the results, removing or explaining the effect of confounding variables (or metadata) is essential. Confounding variables affect the relationship between input training data and target outputs. Accordingly, when we train a model on such data, confounding variables will bias the distribution of the learned features. A recent promising solution, Meta-Data Normalization (MDN), estimates the linear relationship between the metadata and each feature based on a non-trainable closed-form solution. However, this estimation is confined by the sample size of a mini-batch and thereby may result in an oscillating performance. In this paper, we extend the MDN method by applying a Penalty approach (referred to as PDMN). We cast the problem into a bi-level nested optimization problem. We then approximate that objective using a penalty method so that the linear parameters within the MDN layer are trainable and learned on all samples. This enables PMDN to be plugged into any architectures, even those unfit to run batch-level operations such as transformers and recurrent models. We show improvement in model accuracy and independence from the confounders using PMDN over MDN in a synthetic experiment and a multi-label, multi-site classification of magnetic resonance images.

Identifiers

PMID36331278
PMCPMC9629333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.